returnofjakedog
Well-Known Member
Over the last couple of years it has been an almost complete teardown of the roster, and a strong commitment to younger prospects. The Ms have never fully committed to such a movement completely.It is not a rebuild because it is doing business the right way and the way it should be done from the start. To say rebuild like you have never tried it before is insane. So what Dipoto and others should say is that we are going to do it the right way from here on out even though we have shown no promise of ever doing it the right way.
The verbiage is just to satisfy the fans and keep them off your GM's back for 2 to 3 more years before pressure to win starts up again. It is great help preservation, but it is still the right and only way to do it. It isn't new nor inventive.
Call it whatever you want to, the end result is the same regardless of the semantics of the word "rebuild". Personally, I call it a "rebuild" because there is no other specific term to better describe how management has approached.
Lol @ you calling it "insane" for it to be referred to as a "rebuild" because it the correct way to do things. Again, I've watched the Ms for over 40 years now and they have NEVER fully committed to the youth movement and emphasized their development over veteran players in the manner current management has approached it.
Your comment "So what Dipoto and others should say is that we are going to do it the right way from here on out even though we have shown no promise of ever doing it the right way." is also strange as it implies that Dipoto and Servaise are somehow responsible for the methods and moves that previous management executed?? Again, what Dipoto is doing now has been DIFFERENT than ANY of the past approaches to building the team, which in my mind and the minds of many others justifies the use of the word "rebuild" to describe the approach.