ANGELAKERAMS
Well-Known Member
If they weren’t going to address the OL, they would’ve been better off staying at their pick and taking Dye
I kind of agree with you here, last year we were young & injured early on.Call me crazy but with Corbett from Cleveland last year and Noteboom coming back, along with Edwards and Evans drafted last year I think we have good depth at Oline.
View attachment 239954
I kind of agree with you here, last year we were young & injured early on. Getting Whitworth back for another year gave them some flexibility this year... But they are going to need to address that LT/RT concern for sure next year, because I'm just don't think Evans or
Brewer are up for the task as FT starters if we move Rob or not...
Sounds like a very crowded invite Red!guess we nap until the 6th
Well, I called the Boys taking Biadasz, just went later than expected, and after the Rams passed on him many times.
Well, time will tell if the guys they passed on end up good or not.
But, a 4th TE over addressing any of the OL or another LB is dumb.
Dye would’ve been more helpful than another TE.
Patriots just took a kicker in the middle 5th
I’m with you here and I think the Rams were too. They tried to trade down and still get Dye. Same thing could have happen with Cush.
They went BPA both times. Lewis can play and so can the kid from Purdue.
If that was their plan, it was stupid. It was not worth missing out on Dye to get (2) 7th round ( throw away ) picks. If they had got a 5th or early 6th, maybe.
How many 7th rounders even make the team? Almost none.
Not another TE... it’ll be either a punter or a backup QB.Well let's see. We have one 6th rounder and 3 seven rounders. That means another TE, a kicker, and a trash RB. Hell, get a bigass FB since you are going Jumbo next year, ya flippin dumbass genius boy.