fastforward
Well-Known Member
I understand the argument and i'm not unsympathetic. I 'm hearing impaired and have no desire to waste money on a mobile phone to text and receive messages. However, Microsoft and most of the big companies I have any sort of account with now insist on my having a mobile number to which they can send security codes that I can verify so they 'know' who they are dealing with. It defeats the purpose of having an email address and web chat.So if it's not 100% why force it on those who are fully against any vaccine?
Look at it this way, those vaccinated can go out into public and risk getting covid, because it's not 100% effective yet they wont allow those who are againts vaccines go out, with no proof a vaccinated player can bring back covid and give it to guys not allowed to leave.
Nothing in life is 100%. All evidence suggests unvaccinated people are more likely to contract and pass on the the virus. 1st jab vaccinations are less likely to contract and pass on the virus. Fully vaccinated people are least likely to contract and pass on the virus. The bottom line is that NFL owners have billions of dollars on the line and they don't want it messed up by people taking risks. Re-arranged games cost revenue and annoy fans, especially those who are planning trips to see games in 2021.
I understand the anti-vaxxers. I've had the 1st jab and I responded badly to it. I was still having headaches 5 weeks after the jab. I'm not looking forward to my 2nd jab.