I_am_1z
New Member
I go for Oderick... lets do it!
I go for Oderick... lets do it!
From Clayton's mailbag:
Q: With a new coaching regime in Cleveland, many speculate that Brandon Weeden may not be the starting quarterback. Would it be reasonable for the Browns to trade backup Colt McCoy and a late-round pick for someone such as Alex Smith? This would provide San Francisco a backup quarterback with starting experience and a much lower salary.
James in Bowling Green, Ohio
A: The McCoy part doesn't work. Niners coach Jim Harbaugh will find his own backup, so that part of the trade won't happen. The answer is yes to the Smith part. I don't agree the current ownership needs to go on the hunt for a new quarterback, but if it does, a Smith trade makes sense. New Browns offensive coordinator Norv Turner did a good job with Smith the one year they worked together in San Francisco. If the Browns are really looking for a quarterback, offering San Francisco a midround choice wouldn't be unreasonable.
Honestly, the only reason I post that is because of the poster's suggestion that the Browns trade McCoy and a late-round pick for Smith. I thought that was good for a laugh. Hell, I'd rather just give them Smith to let us save the $1 million and get nothing in return.
Speaking of Harbaugh choosing his backup, I don't agree with the rationale of having to get a QB with similar skills to Kaepernick so they don't have to change the offense if he goes down. First of all, there is no QB with similar skills to Kaepernick except maybe Cam Newton. Secondly, I think Roman was so successful with Kaep because he formed the offense around Kaep & not the other way around. If he goes down, you gotta form the offense around the backup; don't just have a backup try to do what Kaep does.
If we draft a backup like Bray in the 3rd round or so, and Kaep goes down so Bray has to play, we aren't going to build an offense around him for a few games then go back to Kaep. That's incredibly counter-productive.
Also, there are definitely QBs with similar skills to Kaep. They may not be as good, but to say they don't exist is ignorant.
I'd also ask if you felt Kaep would be as good as he is 2 seasons into his career when he was first drafted, or is it possible that the Harbaugh/Roman/Chryst triumvirate know what they're doing in developing QBs?
What type of contract will Greg Jennings sign in free agency? 5 year 60 mil?
Not that big IMO. That's more than Vincent Jackson got.
Speaking of Harbaugh choosing his backup, I don't agree with the rationale of having to get a QB with similar skills to Kaepernick so they don't have to change the offense if he goes down. First of all, there is no QB with similar skills to Kaepernick except maybe Cam Newton. Secondly, I think Roman was so successful with Kaep because he formed the offense around Kaep & not the other way around. If he goes down, you gotta form the offense around the backup; don't just have a backup try to do what Kaep does.
Just like the transition the team made from Steve Young to Elvis Grbac when Steve missed a few games. That should remind people that you don't need CK v.2 to keep it going... since Grbac was nothing like Young, even threw it with the wrong hand.
The offense is clearly more dynamic and explosive when they include the pistol package with CK.... but, they can survive and win a few games if they go back to the types of plays they called with Alex Smith, with say, Tolzien as the QB.
The team with Young relied on his legs, but didn't have plays designed around the threat of him running like we do now with read option. A significant part of our offense in 2012 and presumably going forward, is plays designed for CK to take off with the ball. The offense, in the mid 90s, wasn't running stuff like QB power and read options.
We didn't have plays in the offense that were called with regularity in 95 and 96 that Young could run and Grbac couldn't.
If we were to draft Tyler Bray this year, there is a significant chunk of the playbook that he can't run. No defense is going to respect the QB keep option on any option play when it's being run by Tyler Bray.
Do you really think the QB keep is a "big chunk" of the playbook? Like what percentage of the playbook do you think is a drop-back pass? Because I think it's probably close to 95%.
I think it's crazy to say that a drop-back pass is 95% of the playbook on a running team.