Gotcha. At the same time, I’m arguing for my premise that you can’t win NBA titles when a volume shooter is your best player. Kobe is a once in a lifetime talent who bucked that trend.
What were Brown and Tatum this season with the Celtics?
How about Golden State? Dallas' ring?
Wings not volume shooting combo guards.
You think Curry is a volume shooting chucker? That dude is arguably the best shooter of all time.
Spiltting very fine hairs there. You just stated volume shooters.
And shoots in volume. You said volume shooter.
Is it more clear now? I’m rejecting the idea that Brown and Tatum are just volume shooters on the court. They share the ball. They’re plus defenders. They’re great rebounders. To borrow from baseball vernacular they would be considered 4 or 5 tool guys. That’s not Mitchell. Mitchell is just a volume scorer. His defense is mediocre. He’s not much of a playmaker. He isn’t much of a rebounder. He’s a one trick pony. It’s very difficult for a team to win a championship when a guy with that player profile is their best player.
Is it more clear now or do you want to play a few more rounds of Semantics?
Sure, you've narrowed it down to saying you can't win a title if your best player is just above average.. Got it.
And the style. If your best player is only really elite at scoring by dominating the team’s shots taken it’s next to impossible to win a title.
