Stafford and Peyton off the top of my head.
Yes, I can... there's no denying where he was drafted! Just because he's not on the team that didn't draft in the first round doesn't negate that fact. So, help me out with your POV, Was he or was he Not a first-round drafted QB that either got to or won a SB in the salary cap era?
What good was Stafford to the lions when he won a SB.
First-round QBs are often saddled with poor teams, but that is not the point of my post. We can discuss the ineptness of certain NFL teams/organizations if you wish. My team is Washington so I have a lot of first-hand experience on the subject.
This all true. Yet he was the best we have had here in over a decade. is he a franchise QB? Probably not. yet, he would have made this team better, especially considering the draft capital we have given up since we let him walk.
See, I told you guys they were just alike!
McCarron--3-6 for 12 yards
Cousins-- 3-8 for 12 yards
Now stop trying to stick it to ole' Sty!
Huh?Is it really too much to ask for a little context on this board, honestly the lack of continued context is one of the reasons why I needed that break! It is sickening how little thought progression there is with some here, or perhaps it's some sort of personal bias that's at play. ( I can live with a personal bias they don't bother me) here's what I mean...
I do not disagree with any statement charging me with denigrating Cousins early on. Cousins' play early on warranted it and I was not alone in making those assessments. That said, what He has charged me within these present posts are "You haven't ever liked Cousins." as if this was some dating site and my preferences didn't match his. Further, he wrote... "I'll play too. First I want to say Warren Moon was a damned good QB. Something you won't say about Cousins." It is a FACT that Kirk Cousins is NOT a damned good QB, this poster seems smitten with him and just can't take control of his emotion when others make sensible, well-supported assessments about Kirk that don't fall in line with his man-love thingy.
Just because some here have convinced themselves that my assessment of Cousins has, have, or had anything to do with Griffin doesn't make it true! In fact, there's a continued counter-argument that can be made that such charges are nothing more than further infatuation with Kirk Cousins and whatever that weird man-love thing happens to be. I made real-time assessments of both Griffin and Cousins, on the former for those who will recall, I repeatedly insisted that he was mishandled...that is just fact! On the latter, my original assessments weren't flattering but they were accurate. As time went on and he became more efficient my assessments changed. This is why I posted those historical posts proving my change from the earlier unflattering ones to ones stating that he is "a pretty good QB." This isn't revisionist history it is actual history but all focus appears to be on ONLY my earlier assessment because apparently, I hurt his feelings with those earlier assessments and he'll never forgive me or he is incapable of accepting a differing assessment from me for being honest about how I once saw and now see Kirk. (personal bias)
If you look at a post on this thread by him it reads:
See, I told you guys they were just alike
McCarron--3-6 for 12 yards
Cousins-- 3-8 for 12 yards
Now stop trying to stick it to ole' Sty!
It's really strange how compulsively attached to Kirk Cousins he is! He posted this as if it proves a bias against the guy when in FACT, beyond the line with the grinning emoji, the numbers almost perfectly match, and not one part of it is untrue.
Honestly, I stated at the beginning of my last post that I was doing so against my better judgment and I regret doing it now because I held onto a human but now an apparent unreasonable desire that something about the guy would appeal to his better self... I was wrong, and frankly, respectfully ask to be put back on his "ignore" list.
