idseer
Well-Known Member
i am basing my comments on my original post which deals with how much did the sox ACTUALLY improve this off season. not focused on just one particular player. i get that hendriks is more versatile than colome. that's why i brought up mccann. my 'collateral' arguments are relevant to my initial post .... which you are responding to. i am making MY argument ... not attacking yours.MLB has on the average 6-7 extra innings games per year (of course, some of them crucial) if you pitch your closer in the 9th and it is still tied going into the 10th - your closer is very valuable. Also - depending on bullpen use or injuries - you might want to put your closer in the game in the 8th inning and have him pitch two innings. Not much use - maybe, but crucial.
Also - thanks for adding collateral arguments that had no bearing on my post (like bringing in McCann). I was the one arguing that McCann had a better season last year than Grandal. I also posted that at $10 million to the Mets the Sox should have retained him for catching and DH work (which also proved handing in giving Abreu a break at 1st with Grandal playing some 1st base).
But - what is most annoying is when you insinuate that somehow I am countering your point of view - when I am not.