Sharkonabicycle
Bipedal Sea Dog
You're wrong, it's obvious the Packer defender had his hands on the ball first
That does not matter. Just because you have your hands 'on the ball' does not mean it's a catch. NFL rule states (found it for you because you're clearly uneducated and wouldn't go find it yourself - even with me posting this I honestly doubt you'll read the rules):
[FONT="]Article 3 Completed or Intercepted Pass.[/FONT][FONT="] A player who makes a catch may advance the ball. A forward [/FONT][FONT="]pass is complete (by the offense) or intercepted (by the defense) if a player, who is inbounds: [/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="](a) secures control of the ball in his hands or arms p[/FONT]
[FONT="]rior to the ball touching the ground; and [/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="](b) touches the ground inbounds with both feet or wi[/FONT]
[FONT="]th any part of his body other than his hands[/FONT][FONT="]; and [/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="](c) maintains control of the ball long enough, after[/FONT][FONT="] (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, to enable him to perform any act common to the game (i.e., maintaining[/FONT][FONT="] control long enough to pitch it, pass it,[/FONT][FONT="] advance with it, or avoid or ward off an opponent, etc[/FONT][FONT="]). [/FONT]
Sportsdude101 is what I call a sheeple. The announcers and majority fanbase concluded it was an interception immediately after the game, THEY MUST BE RIGHT! Go watch the tape, Golden Tate's feet clearly hit the ground before the moron Packers player who didn't bat it down and he had both hands on it as well.