- Thread starter
- #1
Thruthefog
Can'tre Member
When people talk about reality, it's just a synonym for their opinion. But reality has such a better connotation than opinion does. People believe that opinions are like assholes, but reality! That elevates the opinion to grand status. But alas, when people talk about reality, they're talking about their perception of reality. Which is nothing more than their opinion.
So in this thread I will talk about my perception of reality. First, I want to discuss the big three contracts. Frankly, I don't care how big a contract is, as long as the person receiving it is earning it.
I'll start with C. J. His contract is too big for a WR. Any WR. For him to be able to earn a contract that size, he would have to surpass 2,000 yards receiving and 20 TDs every year. The Lions would have been a better team if they had let him walk, and spread that money around to positions that have a bigger impact on winning. Nothing against C. J. He busts his butt and does everything he can to earn that money. But it's too much to ask of any WR.
Stafford could earn his money as a QB, but hasn't come close to doing so. Doesn't mean he won't. The position is known for big contracts because it impacts winning more than any other position on a football team. He has the ability. At least there is hope.
Suh is the only player of the big three that earns his money. I don't understand the people who talk about a DT as if the impact of the position on winning is equivalent to a got damn guard, but they talk about a CB like it's the end-all be-all of a football team. And I certainly don't understand anyone who can't see that Suh is by far the best DT in football. Geno Atkins my ass. Here's the difference between Suh and Fairley. When Fairley makes a play, it's the only time you notice him. If he's not making a play, he's standing there pushing against an offensive lineman. When Suh doesn't make a play, he's still got that QB's feet moving like a Paso Fino horse.
To sum up, C. J.'s contract makes no sense. Stafford could earn his contract if he steps up his game. Suh earns every damn dollar.
So in this thread I will talk about my perception of reality. First, I want to discuss the big three contracts. Frankly, I don't care how big a contract is, as long as the person receiving it is earning it.
I'll start with C. J. His contract is too big for a WR. Any WR. For him to be able to earn a contract that size, he would have to surpass 2,000 yards receiving and 20 TDs every year. The Lions would have been a better team if they had let him walk, and spread that money around to positions that have a bigger impact on winning. Nothing against C. J. He busts his butt and does everything he can to earn that money. But it's too much to ask of any WR.
Stafford could earn his money as a QB, but hasn't come close to doing so. Doesn't mean he won't. The position is known for big contracts because it impacts winning more than any other position on a football team. He has the ability. At least there is hope.
Suh is the only player of the big three that earns his money. I don't understand the people who talk about a DT as if the impact of the position on winning is equivalent to a got damn guard, but they talk about a CB like it's the end-all be-all of a football team. And I certainly don't understand anyone who can't see that Suh is by far the best DT in football. Geno Atkins my ass. Here's the difference between Suh and Fairley. When Fairley makes a play, it's the only time you notice him. If he's not making a play, he's standing there pushing against an offensive lineman. When Suh doesn't make a play, he's still got that QB's feet moving like a Paso Fino horse.
To sum up, C. J.'s contract makes no sense. Stafford could earn his contract if he steps up his game. Suh earns every damn dollar.