Rambunctious
9er hater
Isn't that completely in line with using background checks and other such regulations? Honest people with guns are not the issue; it's the ill or unstable that should be restricted. I would argue that the cabinets (or gun safes) should be locked, but other than that, legal guns owned by trustworthy people are not being challenged, maybe with the exception of owning assault rifles and the such. The 2nd amendment can't realistically be used to defend the ownership of assault rifles, in that the founding fathers had no such idea that such things would ever exist or be available to the public. Look at it this way, the 2nd amendment is just that, an adjustment to the original document of rights. No reason it can't be adjusted again (not to take guns away, just to clarify and modernize the language).
I don't think we're that far apart Shop...Like I said I don't want crazy people getting their hands on guns so background checks are definitely in order. I don't however agree with your attempt to translate the intentions of our founding fathers. For their time; they we're in favor of the private ownership of some pretty destructive weapons. Weapons destructive enough to defend against an organized army. Their words have stood the test of time, the rights we enjoy have made this nation the envy of the world so we should never diminish the importance of each and every word within the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights...without them we would be living a very different existence. You can not adjust perfection.