Official Cowboys/Packers smack talk thread

[Hank Kingsley]

There is no doubt about that. Just differing opinions on why they won. Many think it was because elliot just ran roughshod on the Packers for 150 yards or so and that it will happen again.

My opinion is it was because of the 4 turnovers. Since that game Elliot has been doing about the same on the Dallas side. On the Packer side the offense has been clicking and there has been one turnover in the last 7 games with Rodgers having a fumble 6 games ago against the #1 defense the Texans. But have taken it away 16 times. So the big thing I see is that there has been a significant change on the Packer side with turnovers which caused the loss in the last game with the Cowboys.

My opinion is Dallas won. All that matters.

Rationalized excuses are for losers.

And Dez caught that fucking ball.

 

[jarntt]

This would make me VERY HAPPY...IF...I believed what Bart Scott has to say. As it is, it's just another opinion. No different than that of anyone on here

 

[es4m11]

Proclaiming that Dez/Romo was the greatest redzone threat from 2010-2015, being proven wrong, and then saying "well, that was just an opinion". That is the typical cowboys fan. Talk shit without anything to back it up.

Dallas did go 13-3 this year and it's a great season. You deserve to have bragging rights. However, many cowboy fans think there is nothing that can stop them from winning the SB this year.

I sure do hate that all Houston fans reading comprehension sucks. Typical Houston fan Bull Shit. Lol /s

In my post you were quoting I led with a fact (Dez leading league in TDs 2010-2014), but nowhere in my post that you are referring to did I actually say that Romo to Dez was the highest scoring duo from 2010-2015. I said they were the best combo prior to both getting hurt in 2015. Which is an opinion. A completely valid opinion in 2014. Sure, I could have worded it better, but fuck it

Do you remember what one of the debates in the NFL was in 2013 and 2014? Who is the NFL's #1 WR? Megatron or Dez...

 

[jarntt]

The big difference I expect is not having 4 turnovers. One was Rodgers inside the 5 and Jordy had a fumble inside the 30. The current packer offense is 20 of 28 in the redzone in making TDs. All we hear is how the Cowboys dominated the Packers with Elliot rushing for like 150. When hearing that you would think they also dominated the TOP which was not the case. If the Pack had no turnovers in that game it could have easily gone the other way. From looking at the last game in my opinion that is the reason the Cowboys won.

So if by chance the Pack has no turnovers they will have a better chance of keeping Elliot off the field. Boths teams offenses are very similar with the cowboys averaging 376 yards a game and 26.3 points per game with a TOP of 31:55 where the Packers average 368 yards per game and 27 points per game with a TOP of 31:14. All this talk of limiting the time Rodgers has the ball is not shown in the games previous played by the Cowboys. The Packers have the same ability to limit how much Elliot can carry the ball as the TOP is like 40 seconds different. Some of the differences I see though is that we wont have Brice and Goodson the #4 and #5 corners starting at CB this time and will have the top 3CBs playing with Rollins, Randel, and Gunter. Jared Cook who didnt play last time also makes a hug difference as the coverage needed to cover him opened up the middle for many of the big plays against the Giants last week

That's a long winded way of saying Yes...

 

[jarntt]

But it is not what Dallas got it is what GB could not do by not being able to finish 4 drives

If Green Bay gets at least 10 with the fumble inside the 5 and a field goal with the ball inside the 30 that is 10 points and if you take away the 3 the Cowboys got it is a 1 point game. If the Packers could have gotten 2 tds scoring a td on the Jordy fumble it is 14 more for GB and 3 less for the boys which gives a Packer win

So it was indeed the turnovers that determined the game

I'm not a big fan of "what ifs". What if we returned 5 KOs for TDs????

Would give more credence to: "we played like shit and you kicked our ass, but we don't normally play like shit, nor get our ass kicked and our QB is playing better than anyone in the league so look out"

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

if we are judging based on previous matchups this season

The Jacoby Beef Brisketts beat the Texans 27-0


Im going the Brady Boybands to win 153-negative 11

 

[fordman84]

Ah no it was fumbled at the Cowboy 25 it was in field goal range if he held on to the ball. So it took away at least 3 and the way the Packer O is now moving the ball most likely took away a TD.

With that and Rodgers fumble inside the 5 that is 2 tds lost to fumbles. Hmm 14 more points would have made a tie game

I look forward to the rationalization of your next loss to us

 

[fordman84]

But it is not what Dallas got it is what GB could not do by not being able to finish 4 drives

If Green Bay gets at least 10 with the fumble inside the 5 and a field goal with the ball inside the 30 that is 10 points and if you take away the 3 the Cowboys got it is a 1 point game. If the Packers could have gotten 2 tds scoring a td on the Jordy fumble it is 14 more for GB and 3 less for the boys which gives a Packer win

So it was indeed the turnovers that determined the game

So every drive that wasn't a TO was points? I think not, but you want to assume they were.

 

[LambeauLegs]

Just be sure and show up here Monday. Dayne will be in a federal relocation program

Why would I not be here? All I have been talking about is how I viewed the last game and what has changed. How that relates for the game coming up is hard to know. I have not made a prediction and wont make a prediction as anything can happen. I just feel that with the changes on the Packer team over the last half of the season that is should be a competitive game that either team can win.

 

[fordman84]

Any "improvements" Dallas has made since their first meeting, is more than offset by the fact that Rodgers is about 25x the QB he was back than

That guy is on a level like we haven't seen in a long time right now

Our #1 WR at the time was Terrance Williams.
I challenge your assertion that any improvement is offset. The drop from Dez to TWill is significant.

 

[packerzrule]

I'm not a big fan of "what ifs". What if we returned 5 KOs for TDs????

Would give more credence to: "we played like shit and you kicked our ass, but we don't normally play like shit, nor get our ass kicked and our QB is playing better than anyone in the league so look out"

couldn't have said it any better

 

[LambeauLegs]

My opinion is Dallas won. All that matters.

Rationalized excuses are for losers.

And Dez caught that fucking ball.

He didnt catch any the last time they played

 

[LambeauLegs]

Our #1 WR at the time was Terrance Williams.
I challenge your assertion that any improvement is offset. The drop from Dez to TWill is significant.

Having the top 3 CBs on the Packer side playing and not the #4 and #5 like last time will help offset that

 

[jarntt]

Just be sure and show up here Monday. Dayne will be in a federal relocation program

If Dallas loses I doubt you guys see me Monday and maybe not Tuesday or all week (cue celebration!). But, that wouldn't be hiding though. It would more be me not wanting anything to do with Football for a while...

 

[LambeauLegs]

I'm not a big fan of "what ifs". What if we returned 5 KOs for TDs????

Would give more credence to: "we played like shit and you kicked our ass, but we don't normally play like shit, nor get our ass kicked and our QB is playing better than anyone in the league so look out"

Oh yes it was one of the Packers worst games of the year as they have not had a game with 4 turnovers other than that one.

 

[sonnyblack65]

if we are judging based on previous matchups this season

The Jacoby Beef Brisketts beat the Texans 27-0


Im going the Brady Boybands to win 153-negative 11

S-A-T-U-R-D-A-Y Night

 

[jarntt]

He didnt catch any the last time they played

and last time you had 4 turnovers...which way do you want it??? Or just whichever way helps GB?

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

Our #1 WR at the time was Terrance Williams.
I challenge your assertion that any improvement is offset. The drop from Dez to TWill is significant.

It's un-American to cheer for the Cowboys

Shame on you

 

[jarntt]

Having the top 3 CBs on the Packer side playing and not the #4 and #5 like last time will help offset that

Sam Shields?

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

S-A-T-U-R-D-A-Y Night

Dear Lord I can't believed I listened to people that dressed like that

I can't believe I dressed like that