- Thread starter
- #1
seahawksfan234
Radical Moderate
Well I figured I'd start this thread because it's unrelated to the other threads currently going and offers us a place to discuss what the Mariners should, or shouldn't do at the trade deadline.
I'll kick this off with this article:
"There seems to be a growing industry consensus that a Haniger trade before July 30 (the date is moved up a day this year because the 31st falls on a Saturday) is a likelihood, if not an inevitability. I saw Haniger scenarios involving the Braves, White Sox, Cardinals and Cleveland, and that list is bound to grow as the nearly epidemic MLB injury list depletes more teams."
Should the Mariners trade Haniger? If so, what would be an adequate package?
I'll kick this off with this article:
Mitch Haniger is appearing in MLB trade scenarios, but the Mariners should not deal him. Here’s why.
At some point the Mariners must stop dumping top talent such as Mitch Haniger to keep the prospect pipeline flowing. It was a justifiable strategy to start the rebuild, but the goal must shift from breaking in prospects to fielding...
www.seattletimes.com
"There seems to be a growing industry consensus that a Haniger trade before July 30 (the date is moved up a day this year because the 31st falls on a Saturday) is a likelihood, if not an inevitability. I saw Haniger scenarios involving the Braves, White Sox, Cardinals and Cleveland, and that list is bound to grow as the nearly epidemic MLB injury list depletes more teams."
Should the Mariners trade Haniger? If so, what would be an adequate package?