Only 4 she had to rule on, doesn't mean the 20 odds suits Watson paid off shouldn't be part of deciding if he was guilt of personal conduct that put a bad light on the NFL.It's Watson 4 as only 4 were considered in the hearing.
Only 4 she had to rule on, doesn't mean the 20 odds suits Watson paid off shouldn't be part of deciding if he was guilt of personal conduct that put a bad light on the NFL.It's Watson 4 as only 4 were considered in the hearing.
Rodger should’ve gotten his read from jags fans (“you sick fuck”) no way will the nfl let him play this year and have fans chanting that during those gamesI understand
I think Rodger is still reading the room
How am I spinning? You do know the judge said DW violated policy, and the NFL doesn’t need charges to be filed to discipline players.Could not be funnier that - again - you are spinning while calling me a spinner.
When it comes to what the arbiter considered, only the 4 cases mattered. This is what was being discussed.
But as someone who is not afraid of questions, the answer is all but 1 were settled so either 25 or 29?
Now go find George.
Rodger should’ve gotten his read from jags fans (“you sick fuck”) no way will the nfl let him play this year and have fans chanting that during those games
Yeah "You SICK Fuck" would be a popular chant when Browns are the visiting team this year.Yeah, and if he does play, that "You sick fuck" will follow him around wherever he plays. And it's going to be a rough spot for traveling Browns fans, have to think about their safety too. There is a ton of baggage that DW brings. Do you dress up your child in a DW #4 Browns jersey? Do you travel and wear a DW#4 Jersey to an opponent's stadium? It's going to be tough for DW to rebuild his image, if he ever can.
I'd be cool with 72 games.Winston 1, Watson 24, you do the math.
The ironyI mean, you don't even seem to know what spinning or moving the coal posts is. Here's an example.....
If I ask you to name all the bad picks a FO has made and you reply by asking me to name their good picks. That is also an example of you being a question coward.
If by waffling you mean have the ability to be rational, objective and see both sides in a discussion I guess I'm guilty of that.
Not sure what term best applies when you say I'm only spinning when I agree 100% with your comment.
Did you include Manster in your earlier calculation?Could not be funnier that - again - you are spinning while calling me a spinner.
When it comes to what the arbiter considered, only the 4 cases mattered. This is what was being discussed.
But as someone who is not afraid of questions, the answer is all but 1 were settled so either 25 or 29?
Now go find George.
good luck with that
robinson was appointed 3/29 and gave her ruling 8/1
The NFL doesn't want Watson to be available for the Browns 12th game of the season, (the Week 13 visit to Texas). If Watson gets less than 12 games they'll have to delay punishment in order to include that game.
just a vague way to say take as long as u wantWith the appeal it's in the CBA to give an expedited ruling from there.
That said if a negotiated settlement is the hold up then that is on both parties
just a vague way to say take as long as u want
if there was any type of time limit in the cba it would be reported by now
lol like the nfl is reasonableThere is not a specific time set no. I think any reasonable person would agree having it run into the season is not expedited
We'll have something in the next week to few weeks.There is not a specific time set no. I think any reasonable person would agree having it run into the season is not expedited
lol like the nfl is reasonable
You and the Matt Ryan fan sure laugh a lot while postingJust imagine if DW plays 6-8 games, the suspension comes in and he misses the rest of this season and say 5-6 of next season?
LOL.
Odds are with you here safe statementWe'll have something in the next week to few weeks.