End of 2021-22 QB Rankings

[sonnyblack65]

Sounds like something that boob Solomon would've argued on here.

Die hard Steeler fan with his FUQUER rating. Bradshaw went to 4 SB's with 4 wins -0 losses for 4 pts. Brady went to 10 SB's with 7 wins and 3 losses, so 4 points but extra off for losing . Captain Kirktard states it better not to make it to the SB , then to go and lose. Sorry but your Mahomes is 1 SB win and 1 loss, so 0 you FUQUER

 

[Cincyfan78]

I do like Burrow a lot but if Baker (or another oft ridiculed QB) had the same performance the last 2 weeks this would be the narrative (and, yes, I also think Burrow is better than Baker)....
LV - "needed a first down to put the game away and couldn't get it. D saved him."
TN - "Needed to score to win and couldn't get it. Lucky D gave him another shot and made a whopping 1 pass. D and K saved him."

I kind of think I see where you're going with this, but I'm not sure I really agree...

By that I mean - Burrow has played really, really well.

Against the Raiders he completed almost 71% of his passes for 244 yards and 2 TD's and 0 INT. A QB rating of 110.

Against TEN - He completed almost 76% of his passes for 348 yards. No, no TD's, had the one INT that bounced off someone's hands (not a bad throw) - QB rating 93 - but considering he was sacked 9 times - that's pretty damned good.

The other thing, too, is that other ridiculed QB's are that way because there is some history there of those guys not always closing things out (Though I think Carr has quite a few 4th qtr comebacks, IIRC)...and Burrow hasn't really been around long enough to be in that position - but when he's needed to make some throws - at least this year - for the most part, he has.

In the end, if your QB is completing over 70% of their passes with a 2-1 TD/INT ration in the playoffs and putting up, on average, over 300 yards - I mean...I think there's more than a few teams that would take those.

The biggest inconsistency with Burrow is really the OL - they can't run it, and they can't pass block on a week-to-week basis - so you get games where there are wild swings - when the line protects, they move the ball. When they falter, they struggle....But that struggle is less about Burrow than it is about the OL, as he's shown already he can take a whooping and still produce.

 

[dtgold88]

Best I can tell you guys are where the Titans were with Mariota. Titans tanked for two seasons and got their QB and a roster. Browns did the same. The run game and oline got built up. The defense is kinda there.

The question is whether Baker snaps out of that Mariota death spiral of banged up mediocrity. Before he got hurt, he was above that so I give him the benefit of the doubt. To a certain extent. When the Titans replaced Mariota, you saw immediate teamwide improvement. Tannehill level performance should be the expectation for Baker next year. If not then Baker's future is as a bridge QB probably on some other football team.

Saying all that, I do expect Mariota to get a shot at starting again next year. He seems like he should be somewhere in that 20th-25th best QB range.

IF Baker returns as the starter - and this is what I expect, but it's no lock - I do think we'll have a better plan than Keenum if he fizzles (our potential Tannehill, I guess). I think we'll know quickly if it was the injury or he just badly regressed.

 

[dtgold88]

I kind of think I see where you're going with this, but I'm not sure I really agree...

By that I mean - Burrow has played really, really well.

Against the Raiders he completed almost 71% of his passes for 244 yards and 2 TD's and 0 INT. A QB rating of 110.

Against TEN - He completed almost 76% of his passes for 348 yards. No, no TD's, had the one INT that bounced off someone's hands (not a bad throw) - QB rating 93 - but considering he was sacked 9 times - that's pretty damned good.

The other thing, too, is that other ridiculed QB's are that way because there is some history there of those guys not always closing things out (Though I think Carr has quite a few 4th qtr comebacks, IIRC)...and Burrow hasn't really been around long enough to be in that position - but when he's needed to make some throws - at least this year - for the most part, he has.

In the end, if your QB is completing over 70% of their passes with a 2-1 TD/INT ration in the playoffs and putting up, on average, over 300 yards - I mean...I think there's more than a few teams that would take those.

The biggest inconsistency with Burrow is really the OL - they can't run it, and they can't pass block on a week-to-week basis - so you get games where there are wild swings - when the line protects, they move the ball. When they falter, they struggle....But that struggle is less about Burrow than it is about the OL, as he's shown already he can take a whooping and still produce.

To be clear, this is not what I think of Burrow and how he performed in those games. But I can assure you if Baker did the exact same thing those would have been the comments of his critics.

I

 

[rmilia1]

1. Mahomes
2. Allen
3. Brady
4. Rodgers
5. Burrow
6. Herbert
7. Stafford
8. Prescott
9. Murray
10. Carr
11. Jackson
12. Cousins
13. Wilson
14. Ryan
15. Tannehill
16. Jimmy G
17. Hurts
18. Tua
19. Wentz
20. Jones

 

[Clayton]

1. Mahomes
2. Allen
3. Brady
4. Rodgers
5. Burrow
6. Herbert
7. Stafford
8. Prescott
9. Murray
10. Carr
11. Jackson
12. Cousins
13. Wilson
14. Ryan
15. Tannehill
16. Jimmy G
17. Hurts
18. Tua
19. Wentz
20. Jones

Just curious, but whats the logic behind Murray above Jackson? Murray has a career record of 22-23-1 and was ass in the playoffs. Lamar Jackson is 37-12 and...well also not great in the playoffs in general.

 

[megalodon30]

Just curious, but whats the logic behind Murray above Jackson? Murray has a career record of 22-23-1 and was ass in the playoffs. Lamar Jackson is 37-12 and...well also not great in the playoffs in general.

He has Wilson below Cousins. That should tell you everything you need to know…

 

[Schmoopy1000]

He has Wilson below Cousins. That should tell you everything you need to know…

I think he has Wilson too low, but other than that. His list looks much better than some I have read on here.

 

[Dude]

Not including Watson

1. Mahomes
2. Allen
3. Rodgers
4. Brady
5. Herbert
6. Burrow
7. Jackson
8. R. Wilson
9. Prescott
10. Stafford
11. Cousins
12. Murray
13. Tannehill
14. Carr
15. Garoppolo
16. Winston
17. M. Jones
18. Ryan
19. Bridgewater
20. Tagovailoa
21. Hurts
22. Wentz
23. Mayfield
24. Heinicke
25. Fields
26. Goff
27. Lawrence
28. Mills
29. D. Jones
30. Roethlisberger
31. Z. Wilson
32. Darnold

Fify

 

[Dude]

Fify

Watson is not a great QB. He did not even play one down, for obvious reasons.

When they talk about multiple 1st round picks, after that rap, that’s when you laugh so much that you vomit a little bit.

Watson is a cyborg from the future. Zap!

 

[sonnyblack65]

He has Wilson below Cousins. That should tell you everything you need to know…

This list is for the year, not career. Lamar was out, and Wilson hasn't been 100% since he came back

 

[Jordan23]

you know why?
all those that rank Qbs but rings.
Rings are a team thing. not an individual thing.

Rings or No rings, Aikman was overrated. Above average I guess

 

[rmilia1]

Just curious, but whats the logic behind Murray above Jackson? Murray has a career record of 22-23-1 and was ass in the playoffs. Lamar Jackson is 37-12 and...well also not great in the playoffs in general.

My rankings are only based on this year

Career would be much different

 

[rmilia1]

This list is for the year, not career. Lamar was out, and Wilson hasn't been 100% since he came back

Exactly right lol

If everyone else was doing career rankings and had anyone other than Brady 1 and putting a guy like Matt Ryan in the high teens, low 20s then theyre clearly nentally retarded in some manner lol

 

[Picklerick 2.0]

Here is my order:
1: Mahomes
2: Allen
3: Rodgers
4: Brady
5: Burrow
6: Herbert
7: Stafford
8: Dak
9: Lamar Jackson
10: Murray
11: Russ Wilson
12: Cousins
13: Carr
14: Jimmy G
15: Mac Jones
16: Mayfield
17: Tannehill
18: Wentz
19: Tua
20: Hurts
21: Fields
22: Ryan

And after that the rest were bad enough that it doesn’t really matter.

But Semian has to be last. He was truly awful.

To think Cousins is better than Jimmy g is enough to ignore the rest of your post.

 

[rmilia1]

Anyone putting Fiepds higher than 30th is outta their damn mind

Guy was straighf trash this year. 30th is being generous

 

[Stakesarehigh]

Murray is certainly difficult to place. When he's physically close to 100% and he has talent around him he's deadly. When he's physically limited and/or doesn't have the reciving talent he almost falls off a cliff.

Because he is five foot nothing and needs his wheels to navigate defenses. I tip my hat to the guy being as good as he has been. Because I thought he'd for sure bust.

 

[Stakesarehigh]

IF Baker returns as the starter - and this is what I expect, but it's no lock - I do think we'll have a better plan than Keenum if he fizzles (our potential Tannehill, I guess). I think we'll know quickly if it was the injury or he just badly regressed.

He has to figure out why he misses high so often. It's one thing to miss but it's another entirely to miss high. Those are picks like half the time.

 

[megalodon30]

This list is for the year, not career. Lamar was out, and Wilson hasn't been 100% since he came back

I’d take Wilson at 50% health over Cousins at 100% every day of the week and twice on Sundays…

 

[Dr. Strangelove]

Anyone putting Fiepds higher than 30th is outta their damn mind

Guy was straighf trash this year. 30th is being generous

He wasn't good for sure but I think we have to wait and see on most of these rookies. Poor coaching and shitty situations and we all pretty much knew they all needed development.
Honestly, I think these rankings should only include QBs with 25+ starts under their belt.