CowboyB
#1 Ignored
so posting stats showing Bradford's rating is higher than Rodgers isn't implying that Bradford is better than Rodgers?? If not, what other point besides the top of your head were you trying to make?
350% less talent? exaggerate much?
continuing to try to justify your original statement is just making you look more foolish than normal
So are you trying to be stupid or is this just a natural occurrence?? I have said exactly what point I am making.
I know your emotions are sky high right now because Sam Bradford is outperforming Rogers but I need you to deal with the words that were typed instead of the bullshit you are fabricating in that delicate triggered brain of yours.
There isn't one weapon of Sam Bradford that is good as Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb or Devonte Adams.
You Packers fans are pretty fucking irritable acting like the bitch you are now after just 2 years of failed expectations. You could never be a Rams or Cubs fan. You'd probably LP yourself.