Why the Vikings didn't overpay for Sam Bradford...

[L.Freamon]

Actually, Looking at their remaining schedule...
Dallas
Jags
Colts
Packers
Bears

they could still sneak in the playoffs.

 

[packerzrule]

The Vikings will be in the NFCCG BECAUSE of Sam Bradford.

He has had a HORRIBLE situation since entering the league.

had to bump this for comedy relief

 

[Manster7588]

had to bump this for comedy relief

One thing CowboyB has is a knack for comedy. He has yet to make sense with any of his thoughts.

 

[CowboyB]

had to bump this for comedy relief

Shhhhhhh

 

[packerzrule]

Shhhhhhh

View attachment 151949

whoopdee fuckin doo

stats schmats - doesn't discount the fact that your prediction is going to be way off the mark


wanna bet who has the better stats at the end of the season?

 

[CowboyB]

whoopdee fuckin doo

stats schmats - doesn't discount the fact that your prediction is going to be way off the mark


wanna bet who has the better stats at the end of the season?

Yeah lots of injuries happened. Doesn't change the fact Sam Bradford is having a better year with a fraction of the talent.

I thought you wren't interested in stats.

I have been wrong before and will be wrong again but for Sam Bradford to be outperforming the discount double douche is entirely embarrassing.

 

[packerzrule]

Yeah lots of injuries happened. Doesn't change the fact Sam Bradford is having a better year with a fraction of the talent.

I thought you wren't interested in stats.

I have been wrong before and will be wrong again but for Sam Bradford to be outperforming the discount double douche is entirely embarrassing.

hahahahaha

outperforming???

hahahahaha

 

[CowboyB]

hahahahaha

outperforming???

hahahahaha

 

[packerzrule]

View attachment 151950

once again with a weak sauce response

plenty of football to be played - in fact, I would bet that by this Sunday's afternoon, both will have the same record

 

[CowboyB]

once again with a weak sauce response

plenty of football to be played - in fact, I would bet that by this Sunday's afternoon, both will have the same record

I don't doubt that but unfortunately for your chickenshit argument which has brought zero substance, today is today and not a few tomorrows from now.

7 interceptions have clearly caused the Packers to lose more games than the Vikings. Maybe Aaron Rogers should work on ball security instead of commercials??

Clearly going hollywood hasn't just fucked with the Cardinals.

 

[Thruthefog]

Shhhhhhh

View attachment 151949

View attachment 151950

Ms. Pelosi? Is that you?

 

[CowboyB]

Ms. Pelosi? Is that you?

Wanetta Gibson? Is that you/

 

[packerzrule]

I don't doubt that but unfortunately for your chickenshit argument which has brought zero substance, today is today and not a few tomorrows from now.

7 interceptions have clearly caused the Packers to lose more games than the Vikings. Maybe Aaron Rogers should work on ball security instead of commercials??

Clearly going hollywood hasn't just fucked with the Cardinals.

again, clutching at straws

the Packers shitty defense has more to do with their losing record than Rodgers

what is really embarrassing is your feeble attempt to infer that Bradford is better than Rodgers


what a moroon

 

[Clayton]

Bradford issues are very well documented. He is a loser. End of story. A garbage man that gets what the defense gives him and nothing more.

He is better than Shaun Hill but I'm not sure if going 8-8 without a draft pick is going to be better than going 4-12 with one.

 

[Clayton]

In todays' NFL, I think if you don't have a shot at the special back, like a Zeke, you either wait, or suffer without a great one

Even the Rams may already be paying for drafting Gurley so high

Gurley is about the only thing the Rams have done right lately.

 

[CowboyB]

again, clutching at straws

the Packers shitty defense has more to do with their losing record than Rodgers

what is really embarrassing is your feeble attempt to infer that Bradford is better than Rodgers


what a moroon

I never inferred or implied but one thing can't be arguing. Bradford is outperforming Rogers this year with 350% less of the talent.

That defense wouldn't be as bad if that QB wasn't so shitty this year.

 

[Clayton]

I never inferred or implied but one thing can't be arguing. Bradford is outperforming Rogers this year with 350% less of the talent.

I would agree that Bradford has 350% less talent than Rodgers

 

[CowboyB]

Bradford issues are very well documented. He is a loser. End of story. A garbage man that gets what the defense gives him and nothing more.

He is better than Shaun Hill but I'm not sure if going 8-8 without a draft pick is going to be better than going 4-12 with one.

He is a top 10 QB with his rating. I would love to discuss this with people who understand the importance of the team.

 

[CowboyB]

I would agree that Bradford has 350% less talent than Rodgers

Clever one!

 

[packerzrule]

I never inferred or implied but one thing can't be arguing. Bradford is outperforming Rogers this year with 350% less of the talent.

That defense wouldn't be as bad if that QB wasn't so shitty this year.

so posting stats showing Bradford's rating is higher than Rodgers isn't implying that Bradford is better than Rodgers?? If not, what other point besides the top of your head were you trying to make?

350% less talent? exaggerate much?

continuing to try to justify your original statement is just making you look more foolish than normal