Schmoopy1000
When all else fails, Smack em' in the Mouth!
Always starts with an agent whispering in a players ear.By no means would I suggest Dak isn't pivotal to this team. I'm really looking at why he feels his market value is so high
Always starts with an agent whispering in a players ear.By no means would I suggest Dak isn't pivotal to this team. I'm really looking at why he feels his market value is so high
Including the game Dak played 10 plays 4-4. Excluding 4-3. They didn't lose one game they would have won if Zeke played. The idea that Zeke makes Dak is a silly narrative floated by people who don't watch Cowboy games.What's the record without zeke
Agree. And without Dak (and with Zeke) they probably win 4-5 games at best. Dak has them over a barrel right now.IMO with Zeke and Dak this year they are a top 5-6 team.
without Zeke and with Dak they are a borderline playoff team.
without both...obviously it isn't looking good.
If Dak is seeking $40M per year my only reasoning is that he is high.By no means would I suggest Dak isn't pivotal to this team. I'm really looking at why he feels his market value is so high
Including the game Dak played 10 plays 4-4. Excluding 4-3. They didn't lose one game they would have won if Zeke played. The idea that Zeke makes Dak is a silly narrative floated by people who don't watch Cowboy games.
Correct. They MAY possibly be a top 5 team fully loaded including Zeke. Take any of their top guys (Dak, Martin, Smith, Zeke, Tank, both LBs and Jones) away and they aren't top 5 without a lot of luckI don't think Zeke makes Dak. I just don't think Dak is so above par that the Cowboys are a top 5 team with Dak and a basic RB.
Mitch in his first year of a complicated system and he was way better then dak. But not really relevant as Trubisky did not turn down 30 mil.lel,
There are more than a few teams that can judge Dallas, but Chicago ain't one considering Dak's stats are better than Mitch in just about every category.
how many of those 3 losses were without the LT?Including the game Dak played 10 plays 4-4. Excluding 4-3. They didn't lose one game they would have won if Zeke played. The idea that Zeke makes Dak is a silly narrative floated by people who don't watch Cowboy games.
Gee...I wonder why?
how many of those 3 losses were without the LT?
That was Daks real problem. Not Zeke missing.
My comment was about yours saying dak is a "bottom qb".Mitch in his first year of a complicated system and he was way better then dak. But not really relevant as Trubisky did not turn down 30 mil.
Mitch in his first year of a complicated system and he was way better then dak. But not really relevant as Trubisky did not turn down 30 mil.
He is a bottom QB. He is average with a top RB and Oline. Without he would be benched. Trubisky is a fine young QB getting better and better and soon will be a star QB.My comment was about yours saying dak is a "bottom qb".
LOL at your team. Pay for a great QB and get a average at best one, then lose good players to the cap. It worked for GB so it should work for you. lol.LOL at this entire post...onward!!
and he'll never get the chance to...Mitch in his first year of a complicated system and he was way better then dak. But not really relevant as Trubisky did not turn down 30 mil.
lol er ok. The truth is it will be higher then 30 when his contract comes due. So you're kinda right but in a stupid way.and he'll never get the chance to...
Not for him it won't belol er ok. The truth is it will be higher then 30 when his contract comes due. So you're kinda right but in a stupid way.
Sure he does.Not for him it won't be
He stinks
Dak has put up better numbers in each of his corresponding years (rooke vs rookie, 2nd vs 2nd).He is a bottom QB. He is average with a top RB and Oline. Without he would be benched. Trubisky is a fine young QB getting better and better and soon will be a star QB.