nefansince75
Well-Known Member
I'd be fine with Higgins but I don't buy the "under the shadow" thing. The real problem when you have multiple playmakers is: there's only one ball. The good news: no playmaker finishes every play with the ball. Every team needs multiple playmakers and teams, especially teams with efficient QBs (like the Bengals) can manage it.Super Bowl week is generally all pomp and circumstance for the two teams competing.
For others, it's a chance to lay the ground rules for trades and other business.
Some h8ings mean nothing and other things are for real. It's being reported that BB and Groh had lunch with Mike Brown and Zac Taylor. It was also reported nthat BB and Mike Brown were seen having a cocktail together. Could be nothing or could be something. Bengals' backs are against the cap wall and they may have to move some players to get some breathing space.
Of Course, nothing can take place until the season starts in March. Rumor seeping out of Phoenix is that the Bengals and Patriots are talking about Tee Higgins. No way they would trade Chase or Boyd, so Higgins is the most likely. For Higgins, it would make him the #1 WR and not be under the shadow of Chase. Of course the rumor mill always churns and when no one has a real grasp of what is happening, they guess, The guess is that the Patriots would switch 1st round picks with the Bengals and give them a 5th and the Patriots would get the Bengal late first round and a 7th.
The Patriots would drop from #14 to #29.
Is Higgins worth it?? Thoughts??