Yeah but I think that is fair value. Locklear is really the only one that is pencilled in for the future from all indications. I guess just to me, if roles were reversed I wouldn’t be thrilled for the return.
Hancock.has...a shoulder..issue ..so ya have to watch that...otherwise he is good .
Yes it would be a Jerry type move that would cause me rage. 2 to 2 and a half weeks out of the season he'll bomb you about 10 to 12 HRs and the rest of the season surround his 2+ week streak will be strikeouts, game of hitless streaks, horrible average below .250 and fielding that'll piss you off to no end. He tore his ACL cause he misjudged a routine grounder.
I was listening to a podcast that said the M’s and Phillies could’ve made a perfect trade by offering QO’s the two. He’d be a great prove it deal, but doubtful any player would come to Seattle to prove it for a bigger contract.
Locklear .and..Cole young...
I like to judge trades not only by what we got in return but what we could have gotten. Is one year of Soto the best we could get for these guys? If so, then pull the trigger. I really don't know the answer. I just hate depleting the farm for a rental then later say we don't have enough to trade of a piece we need because of it. I go back to the Castillo trade. It wasn't bad for the return (Castillo), but it was bad because we could have signed Gausman and still had those guys to plug the holes or trade for hole pluggers.
