Robotech
Well-Known Member
And Poole will never be a super long guy who can lock up the other team's best player in the NBA Finals. Wiggins is the 2nd best defender on the team.
That's why they drafted Kuminga and Moody.
And Poole will never be a super long guy who can lock up the other team's best player in the NBA Finals. Wiggins is the 2nd best defender on the team.
Ask Jordan Poole that. You'll see.
There are many reasons they drafted them. If you take Wiggins off the team they don't even make the Finals. Without Poole they probably still win them.That's why they drafted Kuminga and Moody.
There are many reasons they drafted them. If you take Wiggins off the team they don't even make the Finals. Without Poole they probably still win them.
There are many reasons they drafted them. If you take Wiggins off the team they don't even make the Finals. Without Poole they probably still win them.
Every year they bring in vets, they could easily find a backup PG if they needed to keep the better player (Wiggins)You gotta take the chances with the young guys you drafted if you want to be able to afford to field a team. Gotta let Wiggins go if needed. Who plays PG after Curry? Maybe they'll find someone. Who knows? Maybe Rollins becomes that guy.
Every year they bring in vets, they could easily find a backup PG if they needed to keep the better player (Wiggins)
Sigh. I think you have a lot of things jumbled up here. Curry is signed for 4 more years. Will he retire after that? Maybe, even if not he won't be The Guy anymore. 4 years is an eternity. 4 years ago KD and the Ws won their 2nd title together. Even if they keep Poole he may not be around 4 years from now.I'm thinking about after Curry retires. He's 34 and has reached the pinnacle of his sport. Maybe he hangs it up in a few years? Who knows? It seems like Lacob prides himself in thinking years ahead. Lightyears guy, right? And he seems to want to maintain a team that can compete for the next 10 years. Poole is the closest thing they have to replicating a Splash Brother, so maybe Lacob doesn't want to let that go. Seems like they have enough young, long wings for the future.
Sigh. I think you have a lot of things jumbled up here. Curry is signed for 4 more years. Will he retire after that? Maybe, even if not he won't be The Guy anymore. 4 years is an eternity. 4 years ago KD and the Ws won their 2nd title together. Even if they keep Poole he may not be around 4 years from now.
Right now the idea is to keep contending with an aging core while adding new guys that maybe can become a new core. Wiggins emergence as arguably the best wing defender on the team and a strong offensive support option makes him far more important to the team than Poole. If Wiggins was 30+ maybe Poole has a better case. Wiggins is just entering his prime.
I trust whatever they decide but I strongly favor keeping Wiggins over Poole.
Sigh. I think you have a lot of things jumbled up here. Curry is signed for 4 more years. Will he retire after that? Maybe, even if not he won't be The Guy anymore. 4 years is an eternity. 4 years ago KD and the Ws won their 2nd title together. Even if they keep Poole he may not be around 4 years from now.
Right now the idea is to keep contending with an aging core while adding new guys that maybe can become a new core. Wiggins emergence as arguably the best wing defender on the team and a strong offensive support option makes him far more important to the team than Poole. If Wiggins was 30+ maybe Poole has a better case. Wiggins is just entering his prime.
I trust whatever they decide but I strongly favor keeping Wiggins over Poole.
It comes down to paying one or the other. I think they will choose Wiggins to keep. But a lot depends on how the season goes, how the kids look, etc.They could take another year to decide on this if they want. As you can tell, I certainly hope they keep Poole. Hard to let go of that playmaking and shooting. I'd rather take my chances that Kuminga or someone else can fill Wiggins' defensive role.
If Poole continues to improve and commands max money next off-season, do the Warriors match any offer? I think so.
I wouldn't expect him to, nor should he. He doesn't make that much really it's not some supermax. And no he'd never be able to take enough less to keep both those guys. Wiggins and Poole after this year will likely earn $70 mil or so combined per year and the Ws simply cannot afford them both. Especially because soon after you gotta pay the kids you hope become good.If Draymond declines his player option after this season and re-signs on a team friendly deal, maybe there is a way to keep Wiggins and Poole?
whats that?2. Joe Lacob went on a podcast last week and said that there is a limit and it would be hard to see them bringing back both Poole and Wiggins after this upcoming year, as they will likely cost like $60 mil/yr combined not including luxury tax.
What's what?whats that?
in this envorinoment 26M a year is not exactly a ton....If Draymond declines his player option after this season and re-signs on a team friendly deal, maybe there is a way to keep Wiggins and Poole?
you know.What's what?
its exactly what i told you 2 weeks ago- even ran the numbers for you and you said I was wrong.What's what?
Not sure where we disagreed, even the Yankees had an upper bound. It's just clear the Ws have to plan for one. They've done pretty well these last 6 years so, ya know, it's all good.its exactly what i told you 2 weeks ago- even ran the numbers for you and you said I was wrong.
but again- I can do math.
yup ..light yearsNot sure where we disagreed, even the Yankees had an upper bound. It's just clear the Ws have to plan for one. They've done pretty well these last 6 years so, ya know, it's all good.
Didn't really expect them to keep 5 near max and max guys, nor will they need to thanks to the young 3. #lightyearsaheadinbothGMingandspoending