I wonder if there is anyone left

[Wamu]

You're keeping count?

There have been as many Tommy Boy threads on this site as Oregon football has uniforms.

 

[YankeeRebel]

There have been as many Tommy Boy threads on this site as Oregon football has uniforms.

LMAO Now that's funny

 

[Wamu]

LMAO Now that's funny

Thank you.




And like I've said in the past the only thing I have against Brady is where he played his college ball. I can't root for anyone that played in ann arbor.

#charles-woodson-is-a-douchebag

 

[SlinkyRedfoot]

Only delusional wishful thinkers....


Even those that deny the truth, know the truth.
Peyton was great.

But not THE greatest.

Exactly.

Baker Fucking Mayfield, bitches.

 

[YankeeRebel]

Thank you.




And like I've said in the past the only thing I have against Brady is where he played his college ball. I can't root for anyone that played in ann arbor.

#charles-woodson-is-a-douchebag

Well based on the teams represented on your page that makes sense.

 

[Wamu]

Well based on the teams represented on your page that makes sense.

Dammit don't make me show you my business card again!

Spoiler

And a N.D. fan trying to talk shit about Ohio State.Classic.

 

[Wamu]

Exactly.

Baker Fucking Mayfield, bitches.

 

[YankeeRebel]

Dammit don't make me show you my business card again!

Spoiler

View attachment 207816

And a N.D. fan trying to talk shit about Ohio State.Classic.

I never clicked on the Spoiler until now, had no idea what that was. I am a Golden Domer fan I too have disdain toward Mich.

 

[Wamu]

I never clicked on the Spoiler until now, had no idea what that was. I am a Golden Domer fan I too have disdain toward Mich.

An enemy of ann arbor is a friend of mine.

 

[Ricky Roma]

No, calling you obtuse because it's obvious.

OK then...it it's so obvious, care to point out exactly how I'm 'obtuse' based on this thread?

 

[YankeeRebel]

You should probably stop replying, because your logic is illogical. Terry Bradshaw is not some top 5 QB all time. Eli Manning, Trent Dilfer and Jim Plunkett don't come solar system close to Dan Marino, Dan Fouts or Fran Tarkenton, Troy Aikman isn't the best QB in Cowboys history...etc. etc. etc.

Super Bowl rings by themselves, is an idiotic argument. Period.

So again a QB guides a team all year, in Brady's case a lot more and all those games mean nothing? LMAO and that makes no sense to you?

We all know Marino, Fouts, Tarkenton etc are better than Eli or Dilfer. But you can't negate the fact they failed in big games, or their D failed. The Ring itself is an indicator of what they did the whole year. I can't make that any clearer, of you choose to remain obtuse that is on you.

OK then...it it's so obvious, care to point out exactly how I'm 'obtuse' based on this thread?

Here you go! Brady has lead his team to nine SBs, and won six of them, you seem to think SB rings as a measurement of success has no bearing. Brady has been to 9 SBs that means he lead that team for 144 regular season games, games which eventually led to SBs and of the nine he was won 6 Rings, Six rings which are a clear indicator of his dominance. So dismissing Rings as a non factor is an obtuse point of view, ignoring success to keep an already weakened argument alive is OBTUSE

Have a nice weekend.

 

[Dude]

View attachment 207818

Ready for the Kitchens!

 

[Dude]

Browns are poised to try new recipes with Baker in the Kitchens.

 

[YankeeRebel]

Personally I am pulling for the Browns to at least win that division. Not sure they are KC or NE good yet but they may be. I would love to see the Browns in the SB that would cool.

 

[Ricky Roma]

Here you go! Brady has lead his team to nine SBs, and won six of them, you seem to think SB rings as a measurement of success has no bearing. Brady has been to 9 SBs that means he lead that team for 144 regular season games, games which eventually led to SBs and of the nine he was won 6 Rings, Six rings which are a clear indicator of his dominance. So dismissing Rings as a non factor is an obtuse point of view, ignoring success to keep an already weakened argument alive is OBTUSE

Have a nice weekend.

Wrong. I said specifically that rings, THEMSELVES, are a pathetic reasoning...and they are. I have stated factually as to why. I could've went much further, but realized the level of football intellect I was going up against, and realized it wasn't necessary, so....

Again....if it's so obvious, care to point out exactly how I'm 'obtuse' based on this thread?

 

[Southieinnc]

Well, Manning didn't last as long as Brady. Also, prime Manning did win more than Brady. Further, a lot talk of Manning's playoff record. Well, Manning went one and done to two teams who could not beat NE. NYJ and Baltimore spanked NE the round after they beat Indy.

If Manning took better care of himself, and could still play, he most certainly would have prevented NE from going to three straight SBs.

Brady, unfortunately, has the credits and the rings.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

 

[YankeeRebel]

Wrong. I said specifically that rings, THEMSELVES, are a pathetic reasoning...and they are. I have stated factually as to why. I could've went much further, but realized the level of football intellect I was going up against, and realized it wasn't necessary, so....

Again....if it's so obvious, care to point out exactly how I'm 'obtuse' based on this thread?

Here comes the semantics back track., I guess jock straps themselves are a pathetic reasoning too. Oyyyy What facts?

 

[Ricky Roma]

Here comes the semantics back track.

Semantics back track?

….and Super Bowl rings by themselves. A really dumb number.

Super Bowl rings by themselves, is an idiotic argument. Period.

PS - 'Obtuse?' Still (forever) waiting on that one....

 

[Southieinnc]

Semantics back track?





PS - 'Obtuse?' Still (forever) waiting on that one....

Hey ricky, you got your hat handed to you. You should quit while you can.....