Manster7588
I Support Law Enforcement.
Not funny J, not funny.It must be a way to rub the salty tears from a Stanley Cup Final game 7 loss out of their eyes...
Not funny J, not funny.It must be a way to rub the salty tears from a Stanley Cup Final game 7 loss out of their eyes...
Does that mean Boston fans are done talking about how the referees screwed the Broons out of another championship?I'll take what idiots can't figure out about off season filler threads for $1000.00 Alex
Not really...I don't take numbers at face value. In general, a pretty terrible way to definitively say one guy was better than the other.
Wrong thread.Does that mean Boston fans are done talking about how the referees screwed the Broons out of another championship?
Not really...I don't take numbers at face value. In general, a pretty terrible way to definitively say one guy was better than the other.
Yeah, low blow. My bad. Comment withdrawn with prejudiceNot funny J, not funny.
I would agree in part but only in part. Some numbers are dumb like how many yards a QB passed for to me that is stupid because it adds YAC to the total. But some #s make sense like Completion % or TD to INT ratio.
….and Super Bowl rings by themselves. A really dumb number.
To a degree maybe, but the fact they have the rings means that QB governed that teams success all year and when one QB has six, well hell if you can't see the value in that just say so now so I can stop replying to you.
You should probably stop replying, because your logic is illogical. Terry Bradshaw is not some top 5 QB all time. Eli Manning, Trent Dilfer and Jim Plunkett don't come solar system close to Dan Marino, Dan Fouts or Fran Tarkenton, Troy Aikman isn't the best QB in Cowboys history...etc. etc. etc.
Super Bowl rings by themselves, is an idiotic argument. Period.
I'll take what idiots can't figure out about off season filler threads for $1000.00 Alex
I'm with you. I'd say the same thing if my QB had only 4….and Super Bowl rings by themselves. A really dumb number.
That's why one QB having almost every record to go along with SIX rings makes this so easy for educated footballl fans.You should probably stop replying, because your logic is illogical. Terry Bradshaw is not some top 5 QB all time. Eli Manning, Trent Dilfer and Jim Plunkett don't come solar system close to Dan Marino, Dan Fouts or Fran Tarkenton, Troy Aikman isn't the best QB in Cowboys history...etc. etc. etc.
Super Bowl rings by themselves, is an idiotic argument. Period.
So again a QB guides a team all year, in Brady's case a lot more and all those games mean nothing? LMAO and that makes no sense to you?
We all know Marino, Fouts, Tarkenton etc are better than Eli or Dilfer. But you can't negate the fact they failed in big games, or their D failed. The Ring itself is an indicator of what they did the whole year. I can't make that any clearer, of you choose to remain obtuse that is on you.
A pats fan, calling others obtuse basically because they don't fall in line with their limited viewpoint on what defines greatness in quarterbacks?
I didn't bother reading past the 1st comment because this is what, the 1,000th troll thread started by a Pats fan kissing Tommy Boys ass?