I totally agree. mitchell, moore, handzus, etc. are supposed to be "good PKers" but I think it depends far more on the system than the individual players. If there is a good system and players know their position and where they need to be, then anybody can be a good PKer. On the contrary if the system is easily beaten then no individual can kill a penalty. it's always a full four man job with a unified system. One guy off course will kill the whole thing.
the best "trade" the sharks could have made would be to sign some PK specialist coach with a great history of coaching that aspect of the game, rather than trade their 2nd best young player on the team, 2nd best scorer in the entire OHL, and one of the top scorers in worcester and gut the roster/system even further for a to-be-ufa 4th liner, and very questionably 3rd/4th liner.
the clear evidence of that, by the way, is handzus who was on a supremely dominant PK unit in LA and was on the first unit there, and has come to SJ and stunk. Dougie seems to think that players make the PK, and he will continue adding guys with good PK reputations, but I am quite skeptical.
The one thing I do hope is that galiardi suprises me. he is the only upside of the deal that I see given his age. If dougie sees something hidden in him, and he can emerge as a legit top 6 forward, I will be truly thrilled and the deal wont be a total waste.
Up to now, I havent seen a trade deal from dougie that I thought was terrible. his traded prospects are rarely top 6 NHLers, and he has given the sharks every chance to win a cup (final 4 three times since he took over as GM in 7 seasons is pretty impressive). As such, I have to give dougie the benefit of the doubt until they lose the last game of the season. However, if they do go out early, it wont be pretty...