Maybe this is why
Report: Rangers have had discussions with Sergio Santos
by Chris Cwik | CBSSports.com
The Rangers have had discussions with free-agent reliever Sergio Santos , according to FoxSports.com.
Santos struggled with injuries last season, posting an 8.57 ERA over 21 innings. The 31-year-old has battled arm injuries since leaving the White Sox in 2011.
Has anyone else been underwhelmed by the moves so far? I count one guy off waivers and trading for a pitcher from the Phillies. Both of these guys I've never heard of. I don't expect a Jon Lester type acquisition everytime, but it would be nice to know who we're acquiring. Is JD gonna pick up another bat or two?
Anyway it's the Nationals, not the Phllies.Has anyone else been underwhelmed by the moves so far? I count one guy off waivers and trading for a pitcher from the Phillies. Both of these guys I've never heard of. I don't expect a Jon Lester type acquisition everytime, but it would be nice to know who we're acquiring. Is JD gonna pick up another bat or two?
Do you really think JD is going to tell us all his strategy for the offseason? That would be like Romo telling the defense what play he's about to run at the line. That would be stupid.
Conversely, I'm happy JD isn't making moves that only mildly improve our team this season, and hurt us long term.
Really? You've never heard of Detweiler?
Rangers' Matt Harrison hoping to throw in January
by Chris Cwik | CBSSports.com
Rangers pitcher Matt Harrison is hoping to begin throwing in January, according to FoxSports.
Harrison is coming off back surgery, and is expected to meet with doctors next week. While Harrison could start throwing soon, general manager Jon Daniels has said he doesn't expect Harrison to be at 100 percent by spring training. Harrison was limited to four starts last season due to the injury.
Man can this guy catch a break and have a few healthy seasons?
according to Jeff Wilson:
Rangers will continue to look for a starter after adding Ross Detwiler, "but this takes the edge off," GM Jon Daniels said.
don't know how much this is worth but just read it
JD basically just told everyone, "Look, we're not in desperation mode."
JD basically just told everyone, "Look, we're not in desperation mode."
I get the feeling that's what other teams thought was going on and that's why JD felt like they were asking for too much this week.
Has anyone else been underwhelmed by the moves so far? I count one guy off waivers and trading for a pitcher from the Phillies. Both of these guys I've never heard of. I don't expect a Jon Lester type acquisition everytime, but it would be nice to know who we're acquiring. Is JD gonna pick up another bat or two?
I had read something about this as well a few days ago. I hope that is not who JD is talking about.
what do you think about the earlier conversation about a lower price tag on Hamels now that other teams have made their moves?
I think it's absolutely worth checking into. I would still dangle Andrus.
I am definitely not surprised by what has transpired so far this offseason. They have decided on a budget for reasons only they know and that budget along with who is available pretty much has JD painted into a corner. If they had had a bigger budget I think both this offseason and the last one would have played out differently, but JD warned us that it would be this way so I am not surprised. I don't know if the owners recouped some of their purchase price with an upfront payment on the new TV contract or what, but something we don't know about has put them in "penny pinching" mode. I just hope it is a temporary thing.
understood that from it but it tells me also that the Rangers are still looking for a starter so is it:
1) Yu, Derek, ????, Detwiler & Lewis
or
2) Yu, Derek, Detwiler, Lewis & ????
understood that from it but it tells me also that the Rangers are still looking for a starter so is it:
1) Yu, Derek, ????, Detwiler & Lewis
or
2) Yu, Derek, Detwiler, Lewis & ????
understood that from it but it tells me also that the Rangers are still looking for a starter so is it:
1) Yu, Derek, ????, Detwiler & Lewis
or
2) Yu, Derek, Detwiler, Lewis & ????
understood that from it but it tells me also that the Rangers are still looking for a starter so is it:
1) Yu, Derek, ????, Detwiler & Lewis
or
2) Yu, Derek, Detwiler, Lewis & ????