jta4437
Grumpy Cat
Gracias
Holy cow that kid has a swing. When he fills out he is going to be a beast. Man, that's a power stroke if I've ever seen one.
That is quite an impressive swing
Moreland looks to be seeing the ball well too
Gracias
Holy cow that kid has a swing. When he fills out he is going to be a beast. Man, that's a power stroke if I've ever seen one.
Gracias
Holy cow that kid has a swing. When he fills out he is going to be a beast. Man, that's a power stroke if I've ever seen one.
So I just learned of Holland's mishap & how he is no longer engaged.....
Hopefully the single life serves his pitching career better than the engaged life did.
I think the real questions now are who the last bullpen and bench guy ends up being (I'm going with Scheppers and Baker)
Scheppers at least until Soria is healthy again
Lack of "power" arms out of the bullpen... IMO. Of the right handed variety anyways. Wont be the case later in the year (Soria/Feliz)...but for now, its lacking. Makes me miss Ogando being in there.
Bench wise... Baker, Soto, Martin/Gentry, and the person that steps up to play SS. (Garcia?)
Lindbolm, Frasor, Scheppers and Nathan all have excellent strikeout numbers, I don't know why you think there is a lack of power arms
Lack of "power" arms out of the bullpen... IMO. Of the right handed variety anyways. Wont be the case later in the year (Soria/Feliz)...but for now, its lacking. Makes me miss Ogando being in there.
Bench wise... Baker, Soto, Martin/Gentry, and the person that steps up to play SS. (Garcia?)
Why not start Ross at the ML level and then send him down to continue starting when Lewis is ready??
I think if he's capable at the ML level he needs to get as much time as possible pitching to ML hitters as a starter
Wash has also already said Lowe is not a starting candidate, not that I take anything anyone says too literally
"Why not start Ross at the ML level and then send him down to continue starting when Lewis is ready??"
Living up in Arkansas I miss out hearing some of the comments so if Wash has said Lowe isn't an SP candidate that certainly will play ... but how much of that was messaging to the other guys competing? I have come to believe that nothing that is said to the media as relates to future roster decisions means much. If Lowe wasn't being looked at to potentially start ... what the heck was he doing pitching 3.0IP yesterday ... getting him ready for long relief? Psssft. Lowe is in the mix.
If Wash were to say Lowe was competing for that spot this late in the spring ... if you are Robbie Ross wouldn't you take that to mean "TEX doesn't think I am ready". Sure TEX could install Ross as the #5 but "last man standing" may not be a good reason for him to get the job. What if he does "okay" and then gets bumped by Colby down to AAA (notice I didn't say back to AAA) ... that might hurt his development almost as much as being bumped to the bullpen? Wouldn't you rather have your #6 getting regular work at AAA rather than limited early season work as the #5? Seems to me a veteran as your #5 works out better because a veteran understands the limited role a #5 has. Need to get Ross used to regular use.
Kirkman has much more to gain by taking the #5 and so does Lowe. Using Lowe as #5 opens up a RH bullpen spot for Woods or Lindblom plus Kirkman is still there to eat innings if needed.
One other thought about relying on power arms coming out of the bullpen. Let me remind everyone about power arms susceptibility to the long ball at RBIA. Examples: Feliz, Ogando, the other Lowe ... and Scheppers to an extent too. I think if you have strike out pitchers in your bullpen that is better than power arms if you have them. Having a balance of LHP to RHP in your bullpen helps keep LH bats out of the lineup and takes away (to a degree) the advantage LH hitters have at RBIA.
I speculate.
"Why not start Ross at the ML level and then send him down to continue starting when Lewis is ready??"
Living up in Arkansas I miss out hearing some of the comments so if Wash has said Lowe isn't an SP candidate that certainly will play ... but how much of that was messaging to the other guys competing? I have come to believe that nothing that is said to the media as relates to future roster decisions means much. If Lowe wasn't being looked at to potentially start ... what the heck was he doing pitching 3.0IP yesterday ... getting him ready for long relief? Psssft. Lowe is in the mix.
If Wash were to say Lowe was competing for that spot this late in the spring ... if you are Robbie Ross wouldn't you take that to mean "TEX doesn't think I am ready". Sure TEX could install Ross as the #5 but "last man standing" may not be a good reason for him to get the job. What if he does "okay" and then gets bumped by Colby down to AAA (notice I didn't say back to AAA) ... that might hurt his development almost as much as being bumped to the bullpen? Wouldn't you rather have your #6 getting regular work at AAA rather than limited early season work as the #5? Seems to me a veteran as your #5 works out better because a veteran understands the limited role a #5 has. Need to get Ross used to regular use.
Kirkman has much more to gain by taking the #5 and so does Lowe. Using Lowe as #5 opens up a RH bullpen spot for Woods or Lindblom plus Kirkman is still there to eat innings if needed.
One other thought about relying on power arms coming out of the bullpen. Let me remind everyone about power arms susceptibility to the long ball at RBIA. Examples: Feliz, Ogando, the other Lowe ... and Scheppers to an extent too. I think if you have strike out pitchers in your bullpen that is better than power arms if you have them. Having a balance of LHP to RHP in your bullpen helps keep LH bats out of the lineup and takes away (to a degree) the advantage LH hitters have at RBIA.
I speculate.
Ogando got racked again today so there may be a bigger concern than just a number 5 starter.