• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Your Top 25 MLB Players of All-Time

BallsOfFurry

Well-Known Member
3,137
350
83
Joined
Mar 29, 2017
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
1. His longevity and durability is a big reason why he got all those wins. Which I already said shouldn't be overlooked.
2. Not even close to the biggest hitter's era in history. The league ERA from 1946-1963 was 3.91. The 30s and late 90s were bigger hitter's eras.
3. Post WW2 I would take Seaver, Clemens, Maddux, Johnson, Pedro, and then Spahn.

He played in the era most of the top HR hitters and best overall hitters played in.
The PEDs era of the 90s lasted just 5 years.
His career was far superior to Johnson's and Pedro's. Clemens cheated, that leaves my top 3, Spahn, Maddux and Seaver.
 

BallsOfFurry

Well-Known Member
3,137
350
83
Joined
Mar 29, 2017
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
And usually in baseball, the "modern era" is considered 1901 (formation of the AL) to the present. In which case, Walter Johnson, Christy Mathewson, and Pete Alexander all had more wins. If you mean post-WW2 than fine.

Not really. most consider the real modern era as beginning with integration.
 

soxfan1468927

Well-Known Member
7,001
978
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
603
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,185.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
He played in the era most of the top HR hitters and best overall hitters played in.
The PEDs era of the 90s lasted just 5 years.
His career was far superior to Johnson's and Pedro's. Clemens cheated, that leaves my top 3, Spahn, Maddux and Seaver.
1. Like who?
2. It was still a more offensive era, and so were the 30s.
3. Disagree on your first sentence and I don't care about steroids.
 

soxfan1468927

Well-Known Member
7,001
978
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
603
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,185.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Not really. most consider the real modern era as beginning with integration.
I wouldn't say most. Usually people just call that "post-integration" like they call 1961-present "post expansion".
 

BallsOfFurry

Well-Known Member
3,137
350
83
Joined
Mar 29, 2017
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
1. Like who?
2. It was still a more offensive era, and so were the 30s.
3. Disagree on your first sentence and I don't care about steroids.

Like who ?
Williams
Aaron
Mayes
Mantle
Musial
Frank Robinson
Dimaggio (bad spelling)
The Braves great 3rd baseman
I'll come up with more, but those are all time great power hitters, Spahn faced them all regularly.
 

MilkSpiller22

Gorilla
34,706
6,864
533
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 89,217.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I think Morgan's peak was better as far as best 2 years (1975/1976). Collins though, had an 18 season prime with a 146 wRC+. He was top 5 in OPS+ in 8 straight seasons, 9 overall. Morgan accomplished that 4 times.


I care more about how they rank amongst their peers... and care more about magnitude than longevity...

I also will rank different stats differently for different style of player...


The most important stat for both of these players is OBP, as both are top of the lineup guys...

Morgan lead the majors 4 times, was top 10 11 times and top 5 8 times

Collins never lead the league, was top 10 18 times, top 5 14 times

Even though that doesn't really prove my point at all, I do prefer a player who was the BEST more often... and Morgan was better amongst his peers than Collins was... Sure Collins was better longer...
 

MilkSpiller22

Gorilla
34,706
6,864
533
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 89,217.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Trout might not be in top 25 yet but he is easily in the top 50...
 

soxfan1468927

Well-Known Member
7,001
978
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
603
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,185.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Like who ?
Williams
Aaron
Mayes
Mantle
Musial
Frank Robinson
Dimaggio (bad spelling)
The Braves great 3rd baseman
I'll come up with more, but those are all time great power hitters, Spahn faced them all regularly.
Spahn faced them regularly?

1. Never faced Williams or DiMaggio.
2. Faced Mantle just 22 times
3. Faced Aaron and Mathews just 7 times as they mostly played on the same team
4. Faced Musial and Mays a lot, and they both batted over .300 against him and their OPS against Musial was better than their career OPS
5. Robinson is the only great hitter who he faced regularly who didn't hit him too well, just an .820 OPS.

Not sure how those guys help your point.
 

soxfan1468927

Well-Known Member
7,001
978
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
603
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,185.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I care more about how they rank amongst their peers... and care more about magnitude than longevity...

I also will rank different stats differently for different style of player...


The most important stat for both of these players is OBP, as both are top of the lineup guys...

Morgan lead the majors 4 times, was top 10 11 times and top 5 8 times

Collins never lead the league, was top 10 18 times, top 5 14 times

Even though that doesn't really prove my point at all, I do prefer a player who was the BEST more often... and Morgan was better amongst his peers than Collins was... Sure Collins was better longer...
Yeah I would take the top 10 18 times and top 5 14 times. But I think we are debating the 2nd and 3rd best at their positions all time anyway.
 

BallsOfFurry

Well-Known Member
3,137
350
83
Joined
Mar 29, 2017
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Koufax is not the best lefty ever, not close. And I was half-expecting you to say Nolan Ryan.

No way, Lefty G
Spahn faced them regularly?

1. Never faced Williams or DiMaggio.
2. Faced Mantle just 22 times
3. Faced Aaron and Mathews just 7 times as they mostly played on the same team
4. Faced Musial and Mays a lot, and they both batted over .300 against him and their OPS against Musial was better than their career OPS
5. Robinson is the only great hitter who he faced regularly who didn't hit him too well, just an .820 OPS.

Not sure how those guys help your point.

While I seriously doubt some of what you posted.
Here are some absolute facts.
3.09 career ERA in the band box stadium era.
Fought in WWII and didn't play a full season till he was 26
Pitched at least 250 innings 16 seasons.
Won at least 20 games 13 times in the 154 game season era.
Had a 2.60 ERA at 42 years old.

I'd take him over any other post WWII starter and doubly so if he had those 4 prime years he lost to military service. If he hadn't lost those years he would have likely won 450 plus games.
 
Top