jstewismybastardson
Lord Shitlord aka El cibernauta
I guess that depends on how one measures diversity. If we're talking simply % of minority players, the NBA and NFL have very high numbers of players who would be defined as minority for census purposes, but who make up the majority in their respective sports.
Baseball meanwhile has a large Latino population and the largest Asian population (not saying much) of the bunch.
But the NHL has approximately the same % of players born outside of the US and Canada as MLB, which trails only MLS within the North American sports leagues. They just happen to come from primarily white countries.
So if diversity is minority % - NBA and NFL (in that order) by a mile. If it's balance of races, it's MLS and MLB. But if it's % of foreign born players, you have MLS and then MLB/NHL. But even amidst all of that, it's difficult to account for players who were born to minority parents but in NA.
TL;DR: It's easy to say that something is or is not diverse, but those numbers can be skewed to meet almost any agenda.
i kinda was trying to ask that question earlier when i said: it will be interesting to see if people will still be saying hockey lacks diversity in 10 to 15 years when there will be more Asian and Indo Canadians in the league
the read i get is that from a US perspective, it seems that diversity means more black players
where im coming from is anecdotal ... my sons practices are like a meeting at the UN and the association he plays at is no different demographically than the other neighbouring minor hockey associations in the vicinity