- Thread starter
- #81
calsnowskier
Sarcastic F-wad
And he is like 17th on the all time OF depth list. Fisk is top 2 or 3 on the all time catcher depth list.Joe D is just better, though.
And he is like 17th on the all time OF depth list. Fisk is top 2 or 3 on the all time catcher depth list.Joe D is just better, though.
I think that works only to a certain extent. If DiMaggio really is 17th all time on the OF list, but his numbers still put him as a higher OPS+, for example, than Fisk, then I think it is irrelevant if Fisk is top 2 or 3 (I haven't looked up to see how they compare in that regard, just posing it as an example).And he is like 17th on the all time OF depth list. Fisk is top 2 or 3 on the all time catcher depth list.
I believe Joe D has a better bat. But when you are comparing OF to C, OPS+ is well down the list in important statistics. Catcher is much like the QB of baseball. You need to look beyond the numbers.I think that works only to a certain extent. If DiMaggio really is 17th all time on the OF list, but his numbers still put him as a higher OPS+, for example, than Fisk, then I think it is irrelevant if Fisk is top 2 or 3 (I haven't looked up to see how they compare in that regard, just posing it as an example).
Agreed. I would have a hard time saying Clemente was the best ever.Clemente was an oversight on this list. Thanks for bringing him up.
but this is not a poll for “favorite” player. This is a poll for “best” player.
But I think he belongs on the list to vote for. He may start getting in the conversation in the lower part of this exercise.Agreed. I would have a hard time saying Clemente was the best ever.
Oh, I couldn't care less about that.And he is like 17th on the all time OF depth list. Fisk is top 2 or 3 on the all time catcher depth list.
Even on that scale, I think you would be hard pressed to squeeze Joe D onto a top 10 list.Oh, I couldn't care less about that.
Give me the guy that was in the mvp race almost every year
You're arguing catcher as QB like and the list is void of YOGI??? WTF? here's a guy with fabulous numbers as a catcher, not to mention rings to boot.I believe Joe D has a better bat. But when you are comparing OF to C, OPS+ is well down the list in important statistics. Catcher is much like the QB of baseball. You need to look beyond the numbers.
We are not comparing 2 DHs. We are comparing an OFer to a C.
I have no problem adding him to the discussion. And WAY before Joe D.You're arguing catcher as QB like and the list is void of YOGI??? WTF? here's a guy with fabulous numbers as a catcher, not to mention rings to boot.
I don't know. Thats just a weird take.I have no problem adding him to the discussion. And WAY before Joe D.
I never intended to claim that catcher is EXACTLY like QB. Just that there are similarities. Catcher is definately a hugely different position from OF, at least. I think we can both agree with THAT take.I don't know. Thats just a weird take.
Just a cursory glance at the NFL shows there is a massive difference between QB and Catcher. No single position in MLB is as important as the QB. Catcher is extremely important but I dont think that relevant at all in this type of discussion.
Sure but your emphasis on taking a player WAY before seems like I'm missing something here because most MLB analysts probably wouldn't.I never intended to claim that catcher is EXACTLY like QB. Just that there are similarities. Catcher is definately a hugely different position from OF, at least. I think we can both agree with THAT take.
Is defense part of the game? Or is hitting the only factor? If you value defense, than catcher, historically, is the most underrated position in baseball history, bar none. Catcher is a major grind on a player, so TYPICALLY they don’t hit as well as 1B or OFers (or DHs, but don’t get me started there). There is a reason no one has brought up Piazza in this discussion.Sure but your emphasis on taking a player WAY before seems like I'm missing something here because most MLB analysts probably wouldn't.
Runoff because they are the top 2 vote getters?This poll will close on Thursday AM. As it stands now, there will be a runoff between Ruth and Mays.
I think in the future, these polls should only be up for 3 or 4 days.
To avoid a runoff, someone needs to have 50+1.Runoff because they are the top 2 vote getters?
Does whoever lose that race automatically get marked as the 2nd best in history or will you take that name and include all the others on this list for another poll?