The Bears 2021 Offseason

[BearsWillWin]

You're right, i should be taking your words instead. Words of an old fart.

You’ve got absolutely nothing.

 

[BearsWillWin]

Having high draft picks doesn't automatically mean you will be successful. You still have to draft good players and avoid injuries. Having high picks only increases the likelihood of obtaining better players. That's 501x I've said this. Why are you trying to get me to prove something I've never said? Do you have a mental block?

Name a team that tanked and went on to be successful. Recently.

Just name 1. That’s all I’m asking you to do.

 

[BearsWillWin]

Saying something repeatedly doesn’t make it true.

Dodging a question over and over, however, proves you don’t have an answer.

 

[beardown07]

3 Ways to fix tanking in the NFL: From lottery to NFL Draft Bowl

A look at ways the NFL could fix the tanking problem that saw the Eagles blatantly trying to lose a nationally televised game with playoff implications.

gmenhq.com

And he lost a ton of credibility, and likely the team in doing so. (Doug Pederson)

Would YOU want to play for someone that tanked on purpose? A guy that basically said, fuck you guys, fuck your perceived value or any chance of that growing. Fuck your time, even if it is already limited in this league, I'm gonna shit away your season for the future! Ya! Go Team! Oh, and fuck you fans too. Fuck your financial support.

Super inspiring. I wanna run through a wall for that guy.


It's bad juju too.

 

[BsGenius]

And he lost a ton of credibility, and likely the team in doing so. (Doug Pederson)

Would YOU want to play for someone that tanked on purpose? A guy that basically said, fuck you guys, fuck your perceived value or any chance of that growing. Fuck your time, even if it is already limited in this league, I'm gonna shit away your season for the future! Ya! Go Team! Oh, and fuck you fans too. Fuck your financial support.

Super inspiring. I wanna run through a wall for that guy.


It's bad juju too.

I was addressing this specific statement:

"Tanking is something maaaaybe a GM or president might wish for, but you will NEVER see players or coaches actively trying to tank."

 

[BsGenius]

Name a team that tanked and went on to be successful. Recently.

lol. I never said tanking guarantees success.

Saying something repeatedly doesn’t make it true.

Dodging a question over and over, however, proves you don’t have an answer.

And repeatedly asking the same question that is not germane to what my statement has always been, proves nothing.

You've dug in, i get it. You can't admit you are dead wrong. i get it.

If I were to have said tanking == success. You'd have a point. But i never said that. And that realization is making you mental.

So just stop, you look like a damn fool.

 

[BearsWillWin]

lol. I never said tanking guarantees success

Never said you did. You’re arguing against yourself

So just stop, you look like a damn fool.

Says the guy that insists his logic is good but can’t back it up by naming one team it’s actually worked for.

 

[BearsWillWin]

Signing or drafting good players doesn’t guarantee wins. But I can name teams that did so and won.

Name a team that’s tanked since you’ve been alive and won after doing it. That’s all. It’s easy.

 

[BsGenius]

Signing or drafting good players doesn’t guarantee wins. But I can name teams that did so and won.

A + B != C but I can name a bunch of D, E, and Fs. Somewhere you lost the point. Go find it.

Name a team that’s tanked since you’ve been alive and won after doing it. That’s all. It’s easy.

No

 

[BearsWillWin]

No

Because....

1. Teams don’t tank.

2. Losing isn’t a viable strategy.

You lose. As usual.

 

[beardown07]

I was addressing this specific statement:

"Tanking is something maaaaybe a GM or president might wish for, but you will NEVER see players or coaches actively trying to tank."

He tanked ONE GAME, and he lost a lot of credibility from it. Do people still view Pederson as some sort of elite coach? The fallout from that decision is yet to be determined. Give it a couple of years, and he'll be back to being a coordinator. Save this on your HARDdrive.

 

[PnkPanther]

This is the off-season of

Hey, at least we tried.

Vikings paid more for used up CB

 

[BsGenius]

Because....

1. Teams don’t tank.

2. Losing isn’t a viable strategy.

You lose. As usual.

1. Link says otherwise
2. Sure it is, if it means higher draft picks

Go back to school.

 

[BsGenius]

He tanked ONE GAME, and he lost a lot of credibility from it. Do people still view Pederson as some sort of elite coach? The fallout from that decision is yet to be determined. Give it a couple of years, and he'll be back to being a coordinator. Save this on your HARDdrive.

He lost credibility for tanking one game that you know of? You didn't even know he even tanked. All this lost credibility stuff is bs.

 

[NCChiFan]

Bears sign a DE.... Attaochu.

 

[BearsWillWin]

1. Link says otherwise
2. Sure it is, if it means higher draft picks

Go back to school.

1. Link is meaningless. The guy that wrote it is not an NFL insider.
2. Higher draft picks don’t equal success.

You’re stupid in circles.

 

[Nelly]

Bears sign a DE.... Attaochu.

Basically a replacement for Barkevious Mingo. Would like to see us retain Mingo though if possible cause he was good on special teams and pretty solid in a relief role.

 

[BsGenius]

1. Link is meaningless. The guy that wrote it is not an NFL insider.
2. Higher draft picks don’t equal success.

You’re stupid in circles.

1. but you are?
2. Never said it did.

You don’t know what you are arguing

 

[Nelly]

Look; another thread ruined by a grade-school level insult fest. It wouldn't be the hoop's Bears board without it.

 

[BearsWillWin]

1. but you are?
2. Never said it did.

You don’t know what you are arguing

1. Stupid argument. Never claimed to be.

2. Too stupid too understand your own argument.

You’re so dizzy you have no idea what’s going on.