Vitamike
#H9Csuck!
I get that and because I believe we both appreciate intellectual discussions I've entertained your suggestion of a 'compromise' regarding the 10 Commandments, it's not my argument.No matter how you slice it, you just can't cater a truly free population's interests to any one religious belief. Religion isn't tangible enough and it's far too ambiguous.
And for the record... country music is never a strong selling point as far as I'm concerned. It's like nails on a chalkboard to me.
The real rub with this for me... I don't believe that it's a 1st Amendment rights issue and it always should have been a State issue like our framers constructed it. It works within our system too because our Political System is not Legislative rather Democratic. Our legislative process should always support a Capitalistic Democracy, right?
Now you've never address my argument regarding the Irreligious folks getting a free pass on their belief system and their advantage regarding how their beliefs skirt the Establishment clause just because their 'beliefs' are not an actual religion even though they oppose religious beliefs just as the different Religions oppose one another. That last part is why the framers discussed the wall of separation in the first place. It was to keep our beliefs out of legislation, not GOD and to guard against legislative rule based on one beliefs system over another.
Right now, that's what is happening with the Irreligious and that's the issue...
Now doesn't this clause slice it up by catering to the Irreligious' belief system, a minority interest, in our free population?The Establishment Clause
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. . . .
Establishment Clause - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Doesn't sounds very Democratic to me....