- Thread starter
- #21
elocomotive
A useful idiot.
Now 53-52 in the final set. Isner with a chance to break Mahut's serve and win.... for the 53rd time this set.
That's the problem with Tennis, too much back and forth.
Hate the rules. Why do you have to win by 2? Why not make it go up to ...I don't know....20 and have it next point wins type of thing. That is more then enough tennis.