shopson67
Well-Known Member
Korver and Bender were both very interesting players to round out the roster with.
Interesting maybe, but not exactly in high demand.
Korver and Bender were both very interesting players to round out the roster with.
Interesting maybe, but not exactly in high demand.
Interesting maybe, but not exactly in high demand.
For Korver, at least some the low demand may be that, at his age, he was probably pretty selective re: where he would go. At 38, he's likely just trying to get a ring or 2 before he retires. That would limit who he'd even talk to.
As for Bender, he really hasn't shown a lot in his 3 years. But, he's only 21, so he still has time to possibly develop into something.
End of the bench players IMO. If you're relying on either for meaningful minutes, you could be in trouble.
Oh, I definitely agree with that.
Korver is a guy you can stick on the end of your bench and use him as something of a specialist. Some games, he can help with his 3 point shooting. Some games he can help by staying on the bench.
Bender is a project. If I'm the Bucks, I might even have him spend some time in the G-League if that's possible.
So this includes your team now... Dynamite analysis.I think every team who hasn't won at least two titles in the last decade are mismanaged.
So this includes your team now... Dynamite analysis.
And it was the same mess three years ago. Only difference is that the likes of Donovan Mitchell and Danian Lillard aren't represented by Klutch the way Anthony Davis is/was back then....and entirely accurate. The Lakers front office is a mess.
And it was the same mess three years ago. Only difference is that the likes of Donovan Mitchell and Danian Lillard aren't represented by Klutch the way Anthony Davis is/was back then.