Official Seahawks vs Packers smack thread

[flyerhawk]

Yes sorry on that I missed a few TDS in the last exhibition game against Oakland so in the first 20 quarters of play there have been 5 offensive TDs scored which is better than twice as good as the 2 I had quoted. But is still sucks

And it still doesn't matter. I am simply stunned that someone would knowingly argue that preseason scoring totals were somehow a relevant stat.

And not sure how the offense scored 17 points last Sunday as the offense only scored 1 TD on a pass to Graham the others were special teams or defense or the defense setting up the field goals with take aways

Huh. Field goals are now not an offensive score. Good to know. Didn't realize that drives of 58 yards were products of the defense either.

You probably should stick to your Packers.

 

[SonnyCID]

Dude it is a legit excuse. They were using their 3rd string QB in the final 2 games. How many games does Seattle win with their 3rd string QB? I'm not saying they would have won the SB or anything. I actually had a thread last year about why they would not win/make the superbowl but they would have won the division if they had the starting QB.

You just don't know. Maybe they don't gel the same and win the same games that they won without him. And counting on him to play all year is a big request.

 

[packerzrule]

 

[packerzrule]

The Packers DL is not the Rams DL.

And the Rams offense is not the Packers offense

 

[flyerhawk]

And the Rams offense is not the Packers offense

Of course. And I'm pretty concerned about how poorly the Seahawks defense played last Sunday. I'm less concerned about the offense.

 

[packerzrule]

The feeling is quite mutual. I am concerned about the Packers defense but not at all concerned with the offense.

 

[LambeauLegs]

Well then. The team you root for better win on Sunday. It would be a disgrace to lose to that Seattle team on your own turf.

We all know anything is possible

 

[LambeauLegs]

And it still doesn't matter. I am simply stunned that someone would knowingly argue that preseason scoring totals were somehow a relevant stat.



Huh. Field goals are now not an offensive score. Good to know. Didn't realize that drives of 58 yards were products of the defense either.

You probably should stick to your Packers.

I picked a score of 16 for the Hawks this week going for the 1 point instead of the 2 point conversion. If you have the Seattle kicker in fantasy start him. The problem is as the Packers know from previous games with the Hawks that it is hard to win kicking field goals. 17 a game by the offense wont win many games.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

View attachment 30238

You need some new material. All your gif are old and tired.

 

[packerzrule]

You need some new material. All your gif are old and tired.

you mean like this?

 

[HaroldSeattle]

you mean like this?


View attachment 30261

Much better!

 

[BHF]

He doesnt have an O line that can create holes

We didn't last year either.

The Hawks still ran for almost 200 yards.

 

[LambeauLegs]

We didn't last year either.

The Hawks still ran for almost 200 yards.

Yes indeed he ran for almost 200 in the championship game and you still needed the Packers to fail on 3 special team plays for any chance to win.

The thing is I have read many times over on your team board that the Hawks O line sucked last year but it got better and improved through the season. Many have said the same will happen this year as well with the Hawks O line improving through the season.

The problem for the Hawks is that this is week 2 and not like week 20 so they have not had time to improve.

 

[SonnyCID]

Yes indeed he ran for almost 200 in the championship game and you still needed the Packers to fail on 3 special team plays for any chance to win.

The thing is I have read many times over on your team board that the Hawks O line sucked last year but it got better and improved through the season. Many have said the same will happen this year as well with the Hawks O line improving through the season.

The problem for the Hawks is that this is week 2 and not like week 20 so they have not had time to improve.

Packers seem to have same problem with their defense.

 

[BHF]

Yes indeed he ran for almost 200 in the championship game and you still needed the Packers to fail on 3 special team plays for any chance to win.

The thing is I have read many times over on your team board that the Hawks O line sucked last year but it got better and improved through the season. Many have said the same will happen this year as well with the Hawks O line improving through the season.

The problem for the Hawks is that this is week 2 and not like week 20 so they have not had time to improve.

Someone want to tell him that the Hawks ran for even more yards in the week one match up last year?

 

[LambeauLegs]

Someone want to tell him that the Hawks ran for even more yards in the week one match up last year?

I was at the week one match up and saw it. In week one you were running against the worst run D in the league. The defense that will be there Sunday is not the same as the one you saw last year week 1

 

[SonnyCID]

I was at the week one match up and saw it. In week one you were running against the worst run D in the league. The defense that will be there Sunday is not the same as the one you saw last year week 1

You mean the one that gave up 190 at 5.7 to Chicago last week, then lost a starting mlb? Yeah, they're off to a MUCH better start this year.

Did Bulaga get hurt today? Sucks if true.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

You mean the one that gave up 190 at 5.7 to Chicago last week, then lost a starting mlb? Yeah, they're off to a MUCH better start this year.

Did Bulaga get hurt today? Sucks if true.

Yeah somehow he see's the Packers as having a good D Mmmm we'll see how. That goes.

 

[Itsmytime]

You mean the one that gave up 190 at 5.7 to Chicago last week, then lost a starting mlb? Yeah, they're off to a MUCH better start this year.

Did Bulaga get hurt today? Sucks if true.

I just read that as well, no idea on the severity though.

 

[Podunkparte]

We didn't last year either.

The Hawks still ran for almost 200 yards.

Yes indeed he ran for almost 200 in the championship game and you still needed the Packers to fail on 3 special team plays for any chance to win.

The thing is I have read many times over on your team board that the Hawks O line sucked last year but it got better and improved through the season. Many have said the same will happen this year as well with the Hawks O line improving through the season.

The problem for the Hawks is that this is week 2 and not like week 20 so they have not had time to improve.

Someone want to tell him that the Hawks ran for even more yards in the week one match up last year?

You mean the one that gave up 190 at 5.7 to Chicago last week, then lost a starting mlb? Yeah, they're off to a MUCH better start this year.

Did Bulaga get hurt today? Sucks if true.