black francis
Well-Known Member
Also, Rodgers hasnt lost two Super Bowls to Eli Manning, like the self proclaimed GOAT has.
Brady has had some pretty damn good talent around him, despite his nut riders saying otherwise.
Plus, Rodgers has always had to score quicker than his defense would give up points
Brady always has a solid defense
Atlanta didnt Punt vs GB
Ever hear of something like that, a team not punting?
Yeah, ive read in here that Rodgers choked that day
Right, he just lost at home to him in the first round.Also, Rodgers hasnt lost two Super Bowls to Eli Manning, like the self proclaimed GOAT has.
Yup, 2003 regular season was a difficult passing era, but all the rule changes took affect for the 2003 playoffs. Makes sense Dirt. Good call.
Atlanta punted twice. Something that has occurred 46 times in the playoffs since 2000.Atlanta didnt Punt vs GB
Ever hear of something like that, a team not punting?
Yeah, ive read in here that Rodgers choked that day
Atlanta punted twice. Something that has occurred 46 times in the playoffs since 2000.
The game was decided when it was 17-0? Because that was when the first punt occurred. I guess without Brady at QB, the game is decided when you're down 3 scores.Both after the game was decided
Rodgers first drive, right down field, Crosby misses chip shot FG
Rodgers second drive, right down field, Fullback fumbles on the one
Next time Rodgers sees ball, he is down 17-0
Replace Rodgers with "Brady" and I wonder how much blame New Brady would be putting on their QB
The game was decided when it was 17-0? Because that was when the first punt occurred. I guess without Brady at QB, the game is decided when you're down 3 scores.
I don't speak for New England fans and New England fans don't speak for me. So I have no idea. Probably none for most.
I think the point is that often young elite QBs need time to become that and likely Rodgers too is better in year 10 than year one. So at that point he was ahead in this particular aspect. Don't get all bent out of shape over it.Funny thing is, those are Brady's FIRST 300 TDs. If you look at his last 300 TDs (which obviously there is overlap, but it corresponds almost perfectly with Rodgers first 300), you see that he's thrown 73 INTs to Rodgers 72.
Right but you can't sit here and claim that a) Atlanta never punted when they did twice, b) They only punted when the game was decided, even though the first punt occurred when it was 17-0, and c) That Atlanta never stopped scoring, when they punted when it was 17-0.The big difference between the 2 games, Atlanta never stopped scoring against GB....And they definitely didnt do everything in their power, fumbling when only a fumble can lose you a game, getting sacked out of game clinching FG range, etc.etc.etc, to give the game away
1. I found the fact interesting, hence why I said "funny thing" because it is kinda cool how close the two are in this area since Rodgers became a full time starter. We should appreciate that we get these 2 at the same time, just like we should appreciate that we saw Brady/Manning.I think the point is that often young elite QBs need time to become that and likely Rodgers too is better in year 10 than year one. So at that point he was ahead in this particular aspect. Don't get all bent out of shape over it.
This is exactly where the insecurities shine through. Once in a while it would be nice if Pats fans didn't feel the need to defend everything seen as a slight against Brady. Heck ONCE would be nice.
Both after the game was decided
Rodgers first drive, right down field, Crosby misses chip shot FG
Rodgers second drive, right down field, Fullback fumbles on the one
Next time Rodgers sees ball, he is down 17-0
Replace Rodgers with "Brady" and I wonder how much blame New Brady would be putting on their QB
The big difference between the 2 games, Atlanta never stopped scoring against GB....And they definitely didnt do everything in their power, fumbling when only a fumble can lose you a game, getting sacked out of game clinching FG range, etc.etc.etc, to give the game away
I think the point is that often young elite QBs need time to become that and likely Rodgers too is better in year 10 than year one. So at that point he was ahead in this particular aspect. Don't get all bent out of shape over it.
This is exactly where the insecurities shine through. Once in a while it would be nice if Pats fans didn't feel the need to defend everything seen as a slight against Brady. Heck ONCE would be nice.
It's Martellus Bennett. What he says and what is expected never seem to meet...You can't very well expect him to say that another quarterback is better than the one he just joined right? Yes the guy the question what are you expecting him to say?
Um, you were wrong. You made an incorrect statement.
Now you're moving the goalpost.