How long does Philly stick with Wentz before going back to Foles?

[dbldwn711]

It was YOUR stat I used bud..

This is comical.

Oh... and if you wanna use “my stat” use it correctly.

Eagles first half scoring under Wentz 8.6 pts per game

Eagles first half scoring under Foles 12.25 pts per game.

First... that’s a lot.
Second, Foles faced must tougher opponents in the rams (on the road) and Texans than the cream puffs Wentz faced
Third, that dreadful number by Wentz is actually skewed because of one good game against the giants. Take that game out and it’s even worse!!

#epicfail

 

[dbldwn711]

Please explain what you meant? care to say slow starts was about 1st half yardage between the two? Or first half turnovers? Or maybe first quarter numbers? I've looked at them. Feel free to tell me which one you'd like to use this year.

Balls in your court.

BOOM... see above

 

[dbldwn711]

Please explain what you meant? care to say slow starts was about 1st half yardage between the two? Or first half turnovers? Or maybe first quarter numbers? I've looked at them. Feel free to tell me which one you'd like to use this year.

Balls in your court.

Do you even watch eagles games?

 

[Rockinkuwait]

Hahaha

You bastardized “my stat”. You manipulated “my stat”. Are you seriously going to try and compare stats with vastly different sample sizes?

MORE to the point... are you REALLY gonna try and argue that one of the big problems the Eagles have had this year under Wentz is “getting off to a slow start”? Seriously?? It’s a question that’s been posed by several reporters to both pederson and Wentz all season. Also, MORE MORE to the point it’s not just “scoring” it’s first downs, three and outs, red zone efficiency, jumping out to a lead, etc etc etc.

This isn’t comical... YOU’RE comical.

So Foles throws for 3.75 first downs in the first half of games this year per game.

Wentz throws for 6.8 first downs in the first half of games this year per game.

That's your proof???

This is beautiful.

 

[Rockinkuwait]

Do you even watch eagles games?

Yes, obviously you just see the highlights. I mean how in the hell do you come up with the idea that 55% more first downs is a bad thing?

 

[richig07]

It's amazing that Philly fans now actually have to engage in arguments on this subject. When it used to be regarded as a total joke. lol

 

[dbldwn711]

Your stat was scoring in the first half is on Wentz, when Foles scores LESS in the first half.

How is that the wrong stat? lol

Becsuse you can’t add and divide properly. I can.

 

[dbldwn711]

So Foles throws for 3.75 first downs in the first half of games this year per game.

Wentz throws for 6.8 first downs in the first half of games this year per game.

That's your proof???

This is beautiful.

Have you figured out yet that your first attempt at proving my stats wrong failed or are you still grasping at shit?

Bwhahaha

You’re beautiful man.

 

[Rockinkuwait]

Have you figured out yet that your first attempt at proving my stats wrong failed or are you still grasping at shit?

Bwhahaha

You’re beautiful man.

Nope, even when you dig yourself in a hole and have to move the goalposts and change what you say, your stats still fail you. So sorry.

But for fun, please tell me the time when a team with fewer 3 and outs beat a team that scored more points. I'll let you use every game in the history of the NFL to find that game where the team that scored less won by having fewer 3 and outs.

Then wonder why I chose scoring for slow starts...

Then we can talk about why you think that worse red zone rate, more 3 and outs, and fewer first downs in the first half is better.

 

[Rockinkuwait]

It's amazing that Philly fans now actually have to engage in arguments on this subject. When it used to be regarded as a total joke. lol

His argument for Foles this year is less scoring early, fewer first downs, worse red zone rate, more 3 and outs.

I think we've discovered that Dbldwn11 is actually Eagles punter Cameron Johnston wanting more of a workload in disguise... It's the only possible explanation.

 

[dbldwn711]

Nope, even when you dig yourself in a hole and have to move the goalposts and change what you say, your stats still fail you. So sorry.

But for fun, please tell me the time when a team with fewer 3 and outs beat a team that scored more points. I'll let you use every game in the history of the NFL to find that game where the team that scored less won by having fewer 3 and outs.

Then wonder why I chose scoring for slow starts...

Then we can talk about why you think that worse red zone rate, more 3 and outs, and fewer first downs in the first half is better.

Haha
Who’s digging?!?!

Bwhahaha.

Still wanna stick with your numbers about scoring? Still wanna say mine are wrong?

I’ll give you ONE more chance to say you were wrong and I was right. I’ll give you ONE more chance to say you were just being a dumbass before I SHOW you that you’re a dumbass

Here’s a hint to even help you: as I initially said (and you even quoted me) I said the eagles got off to slow starts in the first HALF (not quarter numbnuts... HALF). Now, go back and check your simple arithmetic and come back here and tell me you’re a dumbass. Trust me... it will be better than me showing you you’re a dumbass.

 

[dbldwn711]

His argument for Foles this year is less scoring early, fewer first downs, worse red zone rate, more 3 and outs.

I think we've discovered that Dbldwn11 is actually Eagles punter Cameron Johnston wanting more of a workload in disguise... It's the only possible explanation.

Tick tock dumbass... tick tock...

 

[handicappers]

I haven't seen this much fighting over 36 inches since the last time I pulled my pants down at a Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader's tryout.

Damn, you have a big clitoris

 

[handicappers]

Oh... and if you wanna use “my stat” use it correctly.

Eagles first half scoring under Wentz 8.6 pts per game

Eagles first half scoring under Foles 12.25 pts per game.

First... that’s a lot.
Second, Foles faced must tougher opponents in the rams (on the road) and Texans than the cream puffs Wentz faced
Third, that dreadful number by Wentz is actually skewed because of one good game against the giants. Take that game out and it’s even worse!!

#epicfail

BooM

Truth Bomb....suck it

 

[Rowdy]

Haha
Who’s digging?!?!

Bwhahaha.

Still wanna stick with your numbers about scoring? Still wanna say mine are wrong?

I’ll give you ONE more chance to say you were wrong and I was right. I’ll give you ONE more chance to say you were just being a dumbass before I SHOW you that you’re a dumbass

Here’s a hint to even help you: as I initially said (and you even quoted me) I said the eagles got off to slow starts in the first HALF (not quarter numbnuts... HALF). Now, go back and check your simple arithmetic and come back here and tell me you’re a dumbass. Trust me... it will be better than me showing you you’re a dumbass.

He’s got to wait until Christmas break is over and let his math teacher explain this to him, it looks like

 

[Rockinkuwait]

Oh... and if you wanna use “my stat” use it correctly.

Eagles first half scoring under Foles 12.25 pts per game.

First... that’s a lot.
Second, Foles faced must tougher opponents in the rams (on the road) and Texans than the cream puffs Wentz faced
Third, that dreadful number by Wentz is actually skewed because of one good game against the giants. Take that game out and it’s even worse!!

#epicfail

Foles has 4 starts, and in the first half of them:

ATL 3 (FG )
Tampa 7 (Clement 15 yard rush)
LAR 13 (2 FG and Josh Adams 6 yard rush)
Hou 13 (2 TD/miss XP, sproles and Ertz from Foles)

3+7+13+13 = 36

36/4 starts = 9 points per game in the first half. How do you get 12.25? Just making shit up? The best part is then you go on a rant about my math... lol and you can't perform basic addition and division.

Leave Football knowledge and 5th grade math to someone else for your own benefit. Those are things you prove you don't know about.





And about these tough defenses... wasn't only one of them ranked in the top half of the NFL in points allowed? Avg defensive ranking of 20th out of 32 teams. How's this tough when average is 16th?? 20th ranked D tougher than 16th??


And the Rams are tougher on D at home? Here's where we all get to see your football knowledge on show.

Since shutting out Bradford and the Cards, 23, 31, 27, 31, 51, and 30. Of the 16 teams with a home game left to play the Rams rank... 16th in points allowed at home. (But I am sure they are really good on 3rd and 7 with 2 minutes left in the 3rd quarter on a cloudy day when the Running backs middle initial is "P" or some ridiculous backtrack you will come up with to cherry pick a stat)

You obviously don't watch much football do you? You literally said the worst defense at home is the tough one. THE WORST ONE. Didn't pick the 2nd worst one. You went ahead and found the bottom of the barrel one. And made that one your hero. It's like saying the Browns last year were the toughest team to beat.


And now you are saying "take out this game vs this team and it skews differently"... Yet talk about cherry picking! lol you are a beautiful beautyful idiot.

Question.. Just between you and me. You really don't believe the idiocy you put on here do you? I mean you are intentionally trying to look dumb right? 36/4=9 isn't beyond your comprehension level is it?

 

[Rockinkuwait]

BooM

Truth Bomb....suck it

He literally came up with 36 / 4 = 12.25 to get his stat.

I love that man. I couldn't make this stuff up if I wanted to.

 

[Rockinkuwait]

Becsuse you can’t add and divide properly. I can.

This is coming from the guy saying 36/4= 12.25.

This is just gorgeous kiddo.

And the "that’s a lot" which actually works out to ranking 29th over a full season at that scoring rate in the first half. lol Yay, ahead of Jax, Ari, Buf, and Ten.

That's the measure for "a lot". Juggernaut of 29th out of 32 teams and a couple TD's better than the Allen/Peterman/Barkley/Derek Andersen Bills. That's your definition of an offense scoring "a lot"???

 

[dbldwn711]

Foles has 4 starts, and in the first half of them:

ATL 3 (FG )
Tampa 7 (Clement 15 yard rush)
LAR 13 (2 FG and Josh Adams 6 yard rush)
Hou 13 (2 TD/miss XP, sproles and Ertz from Foles)

3+7+13+13 = 36

36/4 starts = 9 points per game in the first half. How do you get 12.25? Just making shit up? The best part is then you go on a rant about my math... lol and you can't perform basic addition and division.

Leave Football knowledge and 5th grade math to someone else for your own benefit. Those are things you prove you don't know about.





And about these tough defenses... wasn't only one of them ranked in the top half of the NFL in points allowed? Avg defensive ranking of 20th out of 32 teams. How's this tough when average is 16th?? 20th ranked D tougher than 16th??


And the Rams are tougher on D at home? Here's where we all get to see your football knowledge on show.

Since shutting out Bradford and the Cards, 23, 31, 27, 31, 51, and 30. Of the 16 teams with a home game left to play the Rams rank... 16th in points allowed at home. (But I am sure they are really good on 3rd and 7 with 2 minutes left in the 3rd quarter on a cloudy day when the Running backs middle initial is "P" or some ridiculous backtrack you will come up with to cherry pick a stat)

You obviously don't watch much football do you? You literally said the worst defense at home is the tough one. THE WORST ONE. Didn't pick the 2nd worst one. You went ahead and found the bottom of the barrel one. And made that one your hero. It's like saying the Browns last year were the toughest team to beat.


And now you are saying "take out this game vs this team and it skews differently"... Yet talk about cherry picking! lol you are a beautiful beautyful idiot.

Question.. Just between you and me. You really don't believe the idiocy you put on here do you? I mean you are intentionally trying to look dumb right? 36/4=9 isn't beyond your comprehension level is it?

Hahaha

Ok.. I didn’t get 36. I made a mistake in reviewing the box scores and ascribed the wrong half total in one game to the Eagles. STILL though the sample size YOU choose is not equal therefore it’s not apples to apples AND if you remove the game against the Giants Wentz numbers are significantly skewed. In fact, they drop about 2 full points. Anyone who studies statistics would call that an outlier. He had ONE good first half against the worst team in the division and one of the worst in football. You think that’s cherry picking? It’s not... it’s analyzing and exposing your bogus numbers.

Again, are you seriously saying the Eagles did not get off to slow starts this season. That this point has been addressed multiple times by the head coach and Wentz himself?

Again, people can cherry pick stats to prove points which is what you do. Congrats.

Here’s the only one that matters.

Eagles under Foles 3-1 and fighting for the playoffs.

Eagles under Wentz 5-6 and left for dead.

Keep it up fanboy! I’m loving it.

All I have to do is ring the dinner bell and all of you come running.

Hahaha

 

[dbldwn711]

You say Wentz is the reason for the slow starts. Remind me again how 9 points a game in the first half with Foles starting is better than over 10 points a game in the first half with Wentz clearly not fully recovered from his ACL?

.

You claim the eagles average 10 points in the first half per game with Wentz at qb

Show your work...