Rockinkuwait
Well-Known Member
Sorry bud, you came up with the "he failed to score a TD when given the ball on the opponents side of the field".
Which if you want to know what has happened this year when Foles has gotten that, the answer is 0 points. So your argument to start Foles is that Wentz has done MORE than foles in that situation?
Then how he turned it over once. And if we want to look at tunovers, fine, Foles is turning it over 25% more often this season and twice as often as Wentz when playing from behind in the 2nd half.
So you are saying stick with Foles because he scores less, turns it over more, and puts the team in position to win or tie less often and to lose more often vs. easier competition this year.
I disagree that is the reason to stick with a guy.
Eagles 24 drives with Foles, 21% were turnovers, 1.6 points per drive. vs. 2 defenses that are 30/32 in points allowed (both defenses had their best game of the season... vs. Foles)
Eagles 23 drives with Wentz, 13% were turnovers, 1.9 points per drive. vs. 2 defenses that are 18th and 7th in points allowed (neither defense had their best game of the season vs. Wentz)
But when confronted with those facts, out came the slurs instead of you backing up your position that more turnovers and fewer points make for a better offensive player. Which is why I called you a troll. Because rather than defend your stance of sticking with the guy with the higher turnover rate and lower scoring rate, you wanted to make homophobic slurs.
So calm down. I didn't mean to trigger you. No reason for the slurs. Take a moment and find your safe space, and when you can return like an adult, if you'd like to talk about your reasoning for liking more turnovers and less points from your QB, we can talk over that. But if you just want to shout homophobic slurs, please MOVE ON. This is a football board, not a place to bash the LGBT community. Is that ok with you?
Which if you want to know what has happened this year when Foles has gotten that, the answer is 0 points. So your argument to start Foles is that Wentz has done MORE than foles in that situation?
Then how he turned it over once. And if we want to look at tunovers, fine, Foles is turning it over 25% more often this season and twice as often as Wentz when playing from behind in the 2nd half.
So you are saying stick with Foles because he scores less, turns it over more, and puts the team in position to win or tie less often and to lose more often vs. easier competition this year.
I disagree that is the reason to stick with a guy.
Eagles 24 drives with Foles, 21% were turnovers, 1.6 points per drive. vs. 2 defenses that are 30/32 in points allowed (both defenses had their best game of the season... vs. Foles)
Eagles 23 drives with Wentz, 13% were turnovers, 1.9 points per drive. vs. 2 defenses that are 18th and 7th in points allowed (neither defense had their best game of the season vs. Wentz)
But when confronted with those facts, out came the slurs instead of you backing up your position that more turnovers and fewer points make for a better offensive player. Which is why I called you a troll. Because rather than defend your stance of sticking with the guy with the higher turnover rate and lower scoring rate, you wanted to make homophobic slurs.
So calm down. I didn't mean to trigger you. No reason for the slurs. Take a moment and find your safe space, and when you can return like an adult, if you'd like to talk about your reasoning for liking more turnovers and less points from your QB, we can talk over that. But if you just want to shout homophobic slurs, please MOVE ON. This is a football board, not a place to bash the LGBT community. Is that ok with you?