Yes they gave 2 firsts for Adams and it was crippling. Much as you like QBs that are a year from their draft right now, I also sure you will identify warts once that draft gets closer and 3 firsts would make difficult to add top players. I have no desire to see the Seahawks become the Rams and shuck off first round picks routinely.
Guess we'll see. I don't see them wanting to Geno franchise tag money and I don't see them wanting to push payment or significant dead money down the road for a bridge QB, just isn't worth it. However all we can do is wait and see. Also a bridge QB leaves the question, a bridge to what QB? They would still have to be looking at the draft for a QB.
Oh they intend to address the defense. Maybe sign some impact defenders with the money they save not signing Geno.
then sign drew lock for peanuts and hold off on a QB until next year.
on paper, next years schedule looks significantly more difficult. plus geno had a career year, even broke team records. its doubtful we get that production out of the QB in consecutive seasons. on top of that, we have so many holes on the defense its unlikely we can plug them all.
Folks misunderstand. I would love to sign Geno with the contract the 49ers gave Jimmy G
I don't even care what the AAV is because it doesn't necessarily give an accurate picture of what the contract really says or what it is likely to be in reality. If the Hawks can get Geno back on a deal that carries a 2023 cap hit under $20M and gives the team opportunity to get out from under it after the 2nd year with little to no penalty, then I think that would be an acceptable answer regardless of what the AAV might be. I also fully realize that even if Geno gets a team friendly extension, there will be some people who will use the AAV as a way to disapprove and claim the team overpayed.
Oh yeah, I knew what you meant. My post was more general and not directed specifically at you.
