• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Down on the Farm (2019)

SFGRTB

Superstitious Fan
17,103
2,531
293
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
Eugene, OR and Lake Tahoe
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Fair enough, but those were all 10 years ago or more. The Giants have not done a good job in developing players, nor in promoting those that at least seem to have some promise. I agree that it appears that FZ will be more aggressive. One can only hope. One can also hope that the development gets a kick in the pants. Whatever has been happening in that department has not worked.

I agree the Giants have done a poor job of developing guys the last handful of years, but as Cal pointed out not many guys really showed enough to get aggressively promoted.
 
21,742
3,846
293
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Location
Two hours from anywhere one actually wants to be
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I agree the Giants have done a poor job of developing guys the last handful of years, but as Cal pointed out not many guys really showed enough to get aggressively promoted.

While I agree, I did this before.

Player A

353 minor league games

1313 AB

57 HR (1 HR every 23 AB)

.276/.371/.471

K rate 29%

Walk rate 15%

OF fielding % = .889

Player B

540 minor league games

2014 AB

97 HR (1 HR every 21 AB)

.282/.360/.491

K rate 25%

Walk rate 11%

OF fielding % = .982

Stats don't mean everything, but they mean something. Who would you pick?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LHG

LHG

Former Californian. Hesitant Tennessean.
17,720
7,817
533
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Location
Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I agree the Giants have done a poor job of developing guys the last handful of years, but as Cal pointed out not many guys really showed enough to get aggressively promoted.
I think that the problem has been not so much that they didn't have many guys to promote (which is still a problem, but not the one I think Stokes was trying to address), the problem has been that the few guys that did show they were ready to move up got sat on. Mac is actually a good example of that (and not to the major league level). The year after he showed a good season in the Cal League, they started him back in San Jose for some lame reason about weather (I think). That season was lost because of the arm injury that necessitated TJ surgery but it didn't make a whole lot of sense to keep him back for a month plus (he was injured in early May). And it wasn't like he had some big set of prospects in his way in Richmond either.
 

LHG

Former Californian. Hesitant Tennessean.
17,720
7,817
533
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Location
Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
While I agree, I did this before.

Player A

353 minor league games

1313 AB

57 HR (1 HR every 23 AB)

.276/.371/.471

K rate 29%

Walk rate 15%

OF fielding % = .889

Player B

540 minor league games

2014 AB

97 HR (1 HR every 21 AB)

.282/.360/.491

K rate 25%

Walk rate 11%

OF fielding % = .982

Stats don't mean everything, but they mean something. Who would you pick?
I'd probably lean toward player B. His numbers may be worse in some areas but his general production is better. That being said, I'd want to know what the trajectory is between the two? Which started better in his career? Is one on the decline? Was one younger than his league? Older? What were those numbers versus league average?
 

SFGRTB

Superstitious Fan
17,103
2,531
293
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
Eugene, OR and Lake Tahoe
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
While I agree, I did this before.

Player A

353 minor league games

1313 AB

57 HR (1 HR every 23 AB)

.276/.371/.471

K rate 29%

Walk rate 15%

OF fielding % = .889

Player B

540 minor league games

2014 AB

97 HR (1 HR every 21 AB)

.282/.360/.491

K rate 25%

Walk rate 11%

OF fielding % = .982

Stats don't mean everything, but they mean something. Who would you pick?

I'd pick Aaron Judge ;)
 
21,742
3,846
293
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Location
Two hours from anywhere one actually wants to be
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I'd pick Aaron Judge ;)

Ding Ding Ding! You win!

Player B, naturally, is Mac Williamson.

The numbers mostly favor Mac, but we know how this has turned out.

Still, the Yanks promoted Judge pretty aggressively. And nothing about his numbers stands out as superstar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LHG

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
59,563
15,832
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,400.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
While I agree, I did this before.

Player A

353 minor league games

1313 AB

57 HR (1 HR every 23 AB)

.276/.371/.471

K rate 29%

Walk rate 15%

OF fielding % = .889

Player B

540 minor league games

2014 AB

97 HR (1 HR every 21 AB)

.282/.360/.491

K rate 25%

Walk rate 11%

OF fielding % = .982

Stats don't mean everything, but they mean something. Who would you pick?
No offense, but I HATE these blind comparisons. They are total cherry picks.

Age? Level? Pedigree? Scouting reports? Personality traits? Splits? Fielding eye test? Batting eye test? League tendencies? Etc, etc, etc.

Oh yeah, one more thing... minor league stats mean next to nothing. We use them because we are all 98z ignorant and have nothing else to go on. But batting cage performance, fielding drills, video study etc all mean more, and we don’t see any of that.
 

SFGRTB

Superstitious Fan
17,103
2,531
293
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
Eugene, OR and Lake Tahoe
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
No offense, but I HATE these blind comparisons. They are total cherry picks.

Age? Level? Pedigree? Scouting reports? Personality traits? Splits? Fielding eye test? Batting eye test? League tendencies? Etc, etc, etc.

Oh yeah, one more thing... minor league stats mean next to nothing. We use them because we are all 98z ignorant and have nothing else to go on. But batting cage performance, fielding drills, video study etc all mean more, and we don’t see any of that.

We just don't know the full story, which is why I trust publicized top prospect lists quite a bit, because they (the good, reputable ones like Fangraphs and Baseball America) have access to all of the things you listed, plus trackman and statcast data. There's just no way the masses could have any idea.
 
21,742
3,846
293
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Location
Two hours from anywhere one actually wants to be
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
No offense, but I HATE these blind comparisons. They are total cherry picks.

Age? Level? Pedigree? Scouting reports? Personality traits? Splits? Fielding eye test? Batting eye test? League tendencies? Etc, etc, etc.

Oh yeah, one more thing... minor league stats mean next to nothing. We use them because we are all 98z ignorant and have nothing else to go on. But batting cage performance, fielding drills, video study etc all mean more, and we don’t see any of that.

As I said, stats mean something, but not everything. And no offense taken. In fact, that's the Giants main problem this year, no offense. ;)

BTW, Mac is about 1.75 years older than Judge. Judge was drafted in the 1st round in 2013, Mac in the 3rd round in 2012.
 

tzill

Lefty 99
25,281
6,466
533
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Francisco
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,064.42
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
While I agree, I did this before.

Player A

353 minor league games

1313 AB

57 HR (1 HR every 23 AB)

.276/.371/.471

K rate 29%

Walk rate 15%

OF fielding % = .889

Player B

540 minor league games

2014 AB

97 HR (1 HR every 21 AB)

.282/.360/.491

K rate 25%

Walk rate 11%

OF fielding % = .982

Stats don't mean everything, but they mean something. Who would you pick?


Honestly, in a vaccuum, I'd take player A. I know you're setting this up for Player B, but I'd assume A is younger and has more upside.
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
59,563
15,832
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,400.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Crushed.... 2nd homer in as many games:

Dude can clearly hit, and he looks like he may become a fast-mover.

But he looks tiny. He doesn’t have a bashes body...
 

tzill

Lefty 99
25,281
6,466
533
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Francisco
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,064.42
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Crushed.... 2nd homer in as many games:

What most strikes me here is that there are more players in the stadium than spectators. I’ve been to Sloan Park, but never when it’s empty. Weird.
 

LHG

Former Californian. Hesitant Tennessean.
17,720
7,817
533
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Location
Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
What most strikes me here is that there are more players in the stadium than spectators. I’ve been to Sloan Park, but never when it’s empty. Weird.
I read, somewhere, a brief statement that the AZL is the worst professional league when it comes to fan experience (I don't know how it compares to the GCL).
 
Top