Call-out To Baltimore Fans

[NEPatsfan]

look at the results and read the above paragraph... From article from NFL.com

Sure, then they ranked the teams and only ranked the AFCN 15th on avg. Exactly what I had been saying all along. It's a division of mediocrity.

7th Steelers above avg just shy of top tier
10th Bengals just above avg
13th Ravens avg
30th Browns. bottom tier

An avg position of 15th. You know, nearly dead middle.

There is nothing special about the AFCN.

Meanwhile over in the AFCE the teams rank an avg. of 14.57 overall.

All from the same website.

 

[Tgann69]

Sure, then they ranked the teams and only ranked the AFCN 15th on avg. Exactly what I had been saying all along. It's a division of mediocrity.

7th Steelers above avg just shy of top tier
10th Bengals just above avg
13th Ravens avg
30th Browns. bottom tier

An avg position of 15th. You know, nearly dead middle.

There is nothing special about the AFCN.

Meanwhile over in the AFCE the teams rank an avg. of 14.57 overall.

All from the same website.

So you choose to ignore the NFL saying "directly" not indirectly" that the AFCN is top 2. Instead of u averaging the position "including" the dilution of the margin by including he Cleveland Browns who are ranked 30th. U will certainly go to any lengths to prove ur division doesn't suck including irrefutable language that directly conflicts that.

Amazing.

 

[Tgann69]

So you choose to ignore the NFL saying "directly" not indirectly" that the AFCN is top 2. Instead of u averaging the position "including" the dilution of the margin by including he Cleveland Browns who are ranked 30th. U will certainly go to any lengths to prove ur division doesn't suck including irrefutable language that directly conflicts that.

Amazing.

I have been in the forums for at least 7 years and have never seen a person that cannot ever admit they are wrong or there division is weaker hen another even when the NFL says it... His is a new low.

 

[Tgann69]

I have been in the forums for at least 7 years and have never seen a person that cannot ever admit they are wrong or there division is weaker hen another even when the NFL says it... His is a new low.

Sure, then they ranked the teams and only ranked the AFCN 15th on avg. Exactly what I had been saying all along. It's a division of mediocrity.

7th Steelers above avg just shy of top tier
10th Bengals just above avg
13th Ravens avg
30th Browns. bottom tier

An avg position of 15th. You know, nearly dead middle.

There is nothing special about the AFCN.

Meanwhile over in the AFCE the teams rank an avg. of 14.57 overall.

All from the same website.

By the way Sonny Black will readily agree with me hat the AFCN is stronger then he AFC East.

 

[sonnyblack65]

By the way Sonny Black will readily agree with me hat the AFCN is stronger then he AFC East.

Of course they are but its close , now send the Bighead Ben on paypal to [email protected]

 

[NWPATSFAN]

By the way Sonny Black will readily agree with me hat the AFCN is stronger then he AFC East.

Well that certainley settles it then.

 

[sonnyblack65]

Well that certainley settles it then.

I second that

 

[NEPatsfan]

So you choose to ignore the NFL saying "directly" not indirectly" that the AFCN is top 2. Instead of u averaging the position "including" the dilution of the margin by including he Cleveland Browns who are ranked 30th. U will certainly go to any lengths to prove ur division doesn't suck including irrefutable language that directly conflicts that.

Amazing.

Thanks for proving my point yet again. You really aren't very good at this.

Sure they ranked the AFCN as the 2 overall, but it's based on it having avg to above avg teams, mediocrity. Whereas a division like the AFCE has a power team and three avg to below avg teams.

The overall weight of the division doesn't lend credibility to the individual team, thereby making them a better team. They are still avg.

The ratbirds aren't even the second favorite in their division.

 

[NEPatsfan]

By the way Sonny Black will readily agree with me hat the AFCN is stronger then he AFC East.

As a whole yes, but that doesn't really mean much since the seperation is so minimal. Hence my point you are trying to gain additional credibility for the ratbirds, who are barely listed in front of the Dolphins and the Bills, based on the AFCN as a whole.

The ratbirds are 13th, Phins 17th, and Bills 20th. Not exactly a huge difference. You could pretty much change any of them within divisions and end up with a similar result. (The Dolphins may even be the team that takes a WC leaving the ratbirds sitting at home crying at the base of the statue of a man that was involved in a double homicide.)

So congratulations on winning the preseason division v division SB.

 

[NEPatsfan]

On a side note, the same website tgann keeps citing, doesn't even list Flacco in the top ten year end index of NFL QB's

Even Tony Romo beats him out.

 

[NEPatsfan]

And now that I'm looking into it, it appears an argument can be made for Tannehill that he is a better QB than Flacco.

Flacco year end stats

27 tds 12 ints 3,986 yards 91.0 rating

Tannehill

27 tds 12 ints 4,045 yards 92.8 rating

Using tgann's logic Tannehill is on the way to the Hall of Fame

 

[Tgann69]

Thanks for proving my point yet again. You really aren't very good at this.

Sure they ranked the AFCN as the 2 overall, but it's based on it having avg to above avg teams, mediocrity. Whereas a division like the AFCE has a power team and three avg to below avg teams.

The overall weight of the division doesn't lend credibility to the individual team, thereby making them a better team. They are still avg.

The ratbirds aren't even the second favorite in their division.

So we agree. Baltimore is great and the AFCN is amazing next

 

[Tgann69]

And now that I'm looking into it, it appears an argument can be made for Tannehill that he is a better QB than Flacco.

Flacco year end stats

27 tds 12 ints 3,986 yards 91.0 rating

Tannehill

27 tds 12 ints 4,045 yards 92.8 rating

Using tgann's logic Tannehill is on the way to the Hall of Fame

Bc stats are what matter all the time.

Fail.

 

[sonnyblack65]

And now that I'm looking into it, it appears an argument can be made for Tannehill that he is a better QB than Flacco.

Flacco year end stats

27 tds 12 ints 3,986 yards 91.0 rating

Tannehill

27 tds 12 ints 4,045 yards 92.8 rating

Using tgann's logic Tannehill is on the way to the Hall of Fame

The difference is that Flacco turns it up in the playoff when it counts. There are regular season hero's and then they fold in playoffs

 

[Tgann69]

The difference is that Flacco turns it up in the playoff when it counts. There are regular season hero's and then they fold in playoffs

^Bingo.

U don't want to be playing Flacco in the playoffs. Period.

 

[sonnyblack65]

^Bingo.

U don't want to be playing Flacco in the playoffs. Period.

he aint no Brady but then again Manning aint no Flacco

 

[FaCe-LeE-uS]

The difference is that Flacco turns it up in the playoff when it counts. There are regular season hero's and then they fold in playoffs

 

[Tgann69]

he aint no Brady but then again Manning aint no Flacco

Flacco is 10-5 in the playoffs since he started in 2008.

He has only played "2" games at home in the playoffs. Amazing win road playoff percentage.

Flacco also has almost twice as many playoff victories as Tom Brady since 2008 when he came into the league.

 

[sonnyblack65]

Flacco is 10-5 in the playoffs since he started in 2008.

He has only played "2" games at home in the playoffs. Amazing win road playoff percentage.

Flacco also has almost twice as many playoff victories as Tom Brady since 2008 when he came into the league.

weak Brady was 10-0 with 3 SB's and last SB MVp again boring zzz but Flacco is still good. But this is all in past, lets see what 2015 brings

 

[Tgann69]

weak Brady was 10-0 with 3 SB's and last SB MVp again boring zzz but Flacco is still good. But this is all in past, lets see what 2015 brings

Flacco can't help it if younger then Brady. In the same NFL time period since Flacco has been in the league in 2008 Flacco has almost twice as many playoff victories.