Just make sure you verify anything he posts or says. Not like he's been accurate EVER.No telling what you are talking about, you jump all over the past history to cherry pick various points.
Here's an idea, why don't you explain why NFL.com thinks the AFCN is an avg division based on the team rankings and it avg out to 15th.?
I noticed you chose to ignore my post dismantling your narrative, using the same website you keep touting.
...
↑tgann69
QUOTE
You do realize you and others from NE are the only people in the world that don't think Dlacco dominated NE that game.
3TDs did the defense do that? laughable.
NEPatsfan
QUOTE
But I thought you said Revis was the sheit?
Love how you are alwasy trying to have it both ways.
2013 AFCCG correct?
Actually if you look at their team rankings you find it's exactly what I said. A Division with multiple above avg teams.
Steelers at 7, above avg. just shy of upper tier
Bengals at 10, above avg
Ravens at 13, above avg, to avg
Browns at 30, bottom tier
Avg position of 15, mediocrity across the board.
Meanwhile over in the AFCE you have a Top tier team with a group of
Pats at 1, obviously top tier with that spot
Dolphins at 17, below avg to avg
Bills at 20, below avg
Jets at 21, below avg
Avg position 14.75, mediocrity skewed by a top tier team.
So my position stands, the AFCN is a mediocrity with avg to above avg teams while the AFCE is mediocrity base don avg ranking but skewed but one superior team.
I said Flacco torched your secondary in the 2013 AFCCG.You tell us, you were the one commenting.
I said Flacco torched your secondary in the 2013 AFCCG.
You replied "I thought you said Revis was so good love how you always trying to have it both ways"
So we are talking about he 2013 AFCCG game correct and when u wrote the above u understood his right?
I was talking about the 2013 AFCCG game do you stand by your comment?You've also made the same claim about their most recent meeting.
I was talking about the 2013 AFCCG game do you stand by your comment?
This was my comment where I said Flacco torched NE secondary. You do realize this game was played in 2013??2013 was won by our old defense? Laughable...Do you even know what that defense was ranked?
Efficiently torched. Here are the stats. 3 Tds 0ints... Brady had 3 picks.
View attachment 17108
This was my comment where I said Flacco torched NE secondary. You do realize this game was played in 2013??
Look at the score.
So do u agree that Flacco torched Revis and company that year?
Yeah he really torched Revis in that game. was that game played in Tampa or Baltimore?This was my comment where I said Flacco torched NE secondary. You do realize this game was played in 2013??
Look at the score.
So do u agree that Flacco torched Revis and company that year?
And you have also said Flacco torched the Pats in the most recent meeting. So what exactly is your point, that there was a bit of confusion on which game was being referred?
You have claimed the same about both, so my point about your claiming Revis is a huge loss for NE still stands. You try and have it both ways nearly all the time.
By the way why can't you explain away the fact that nfl.com thinks the AFCN is just avg?
I was saying Flacco torched NE secondary in 2013. You stated I can't have it both ways with Revis... Now that u know I was talking about the 2013 game do u agree that Revis was torched?
It's impossible to carry on a conversation with u... All u do is insult... LaterYou really are an idiot.
And I clearly pointed out there had been confusion as to which game you were talking about since you stated that Flacco torched them in both games in question.
So no he didn't torch revis in that game, but you were/are trying to have it both ways in the most recent game.
Now how do you explain that the nfl.com thinks the AFCN is just agv? In fact they actually have the AFCE as slightly better than the overall ranking of the AFCN.
It's impossible to carry on a conversation with u... All u do is insult... Later
I lost my map so I'm lost.It's impossible to carry on a conversation with u... All u do is insult... Later