PPR leagues were not really a thing during Barry's era. Sure they existed, but they surely weren't mainstream, shouldn't hold that against him
She's in our $$ league so no worries there either
So i guess, thangs for proving my point? We're talking fantasy, and when it comes to fantasy do were really care that Barry Sanders was a better pure RB than Emmitt, or do we care who scored us the most points? And does it really matter on Tuesday morning why player X outscored player Y, does it matter that ones oline was better than the other? Not really, all that matters is who helped win the gamers. . And if the best fantasy RB happened to be behind the best oline in the oast 30 years, than i guess that guy's name is Emmit Smith, even though Barry was a better pure RB..
Offensive line talk is subjective IMO.
I also so said non PPR leagues because they pulled him in inside the 5 yard line. What did he average in scores? 10 or 11 TDs? Meanwhile LT some others were scoring much more. We are talking fantasy points here.
Offensive line talk is subjective IMO.
But a quick search on the internet and most articles/forums seem to favor TREFF's point of view. Just saying.
Barry Sander's.....The Greatest Of All Time
Dallas Cowboys: Barry Sanders talks Cowboys offensive line
Poor planning. I refused to get married any time during football season. I told her I didn't want our anniversary to fall on an important game or something. She really wanted to get married on the day we met or our first date or something, but it was in February and I wasn't going to put myself in that situation where it falls on a Super Bowl day. She insisted that she "was never gonna be mad at me if it did" or some shit, but I wasn't falling for that.
Actually I'm not wrong, one scored more fantasy points, longer and more consistently than the other, and the other was a better RB who played behind a mediocre asst best line, especially when compared you the first..pretty damned simple, and how anyone can't see the innocuous difference in the two circumstances and why there's no double standard/hypocrissy is beyond me
I got married before I knew what fantasy football was (almost 30 years ago).
You're confusing two different conversations into one. .Smitty and i were simply talking football when discussing the olines.. not who was a better fantasy back there's a massive difference. Michel Vick can be a great fantasy QB, didn't mean he was a better QB than anyone. So why can't Emmitt be a better fantasy back (which he arguably was) with Barry being a better pure RB, and the reason why being he had an inferior oline in comparison, without it being a contradiction?
No excuse...
I only bring it up not to argue against your point, just bringing up the the different era's. Both from an evolving fantasy scoring aspect, and the NFL offenses in general. Would Barry and Emmit have been even bigger studs if they played during the offensive explosion that Fualk and LT did? Or were LT and Faulk just that damned good that they'd have been beasts in the earlier period? And That's the area where just who scored the most points doesn't tell the whole story
Well alrighty, cling to being confused and incorrect, fine by me. If you realized that to start with there would've been no need to point out some percieved hyoocrisy on my part, no need for this entire discussion which started by your scratching your head, in apparent confusion so. . Well. . There you have it
