Clayton
Well-Known Member
I thought you had to be good to make demands. Maybe there is a gm out there that thinks he can be fixed
I thought you had to be good to make demands. Maybe there is a gm out there that thinks he can be fixed
Same thought I had. Like, dude you aren't good enough to be making demands like that. But good luckI thought you had to be good to make demands. Maybe there is a gm out there that thinks he can be fixed
I think he was 'good by comparison' for a few years..... That is, when you're starting Michael Jordan, Billy Price, and Bobby Hart, it's hard to be seen as the weak-link. This past year he was the lowest performer in several games and this was a line that was playing a 4th round rookie and a RT that was physically limited.Williams hasn't really ever been that good...I think he had 1 year where he was "good" but nothing over the top...and since then he's been...sub par to be kind, and last year was a disaster. Maybe the injury was a big part of that, but then it's his fault for playing on a knee that clearly made him the worst rated LT in the game ...
IIRC, he was the worst rated LT in the NFL last year.I think he was 'good by comparison' for a few years..... That is, when you're starting Michael Jordan, Billy Price, and Bobby Hart, it's hard to be seen as the weak-link. This past year he was the lowest performer in several games and this was a line that was playing a 4th round rookie and a RT that was physically limited.
Yeah.... It's amazing how much the Orlando Brown deal makes sense. Seemed like a surprise deal when it happened, but given all the circumstances and opportunities created by the deal, it really worked out well.IIRC, he was the worst rated LT in the NFL last year.
Not good, Bob. Not good.
Was it the injury? He originally sustained the knee-cap injury in week 4 or 5, but was able to play with a brace. But, yes - he was "OK" by how bad the rest of the line was, but has never really graded out more than just marginally.
I also don't understand why he wouldn't want to just ball out at RT, go and win that job, and ball out and go off into F/A and make some bank. He really doesn't have a ton of leverage to demand a trade. The LT spot is secured, and they have Carman and Adeniji who can both play LT in a pinch, and Adeniji and Collins (still on the roster) at RT - with designs of getting a look at Carman at RT...so, basically...the Bengals are at least stocked at the OT's spot and that's before you add Ford to the mix. Williams threatens to sit out - and what's the impact? None. Bengals have 4 guys for 2 spots without Williams at the moment, and can still draft an OT in the first 2-3 rounds.
The only leverage for trading Williams is to get the 12.6M back in cap space - which is a massive chunk...suddenly - Bengals have room for another major contract either in F/A or for an extension.
The only leverage for trading Williams is to get the 12.6M back in cap space - which is a massive chunk...suddenly - Bengals have room for another major contract either in F/A or for an extension.
Not sure - they apparently really liked the kid they drafted last year, Tycen Anderson...I think he'll be in the mix as well this year. That gives you Hill, Anderson, and Scott...maybe they do take another guy, but my guess is it would be later than sooner.Nick Scott is defintely a Lou guy. Weak coverage, but extremely versitle. A plug and play in his disguise schemes. If nothing else, solid depth. Still looking to draft a safety early.
Browns did well there for sure.
Anytime you can add a 30 year old receiver that can put up 300-400 yards a season, you just have to do it. Should we order the rings?
And I can understand that if it’s a depth move but isn’t he going to be their WR2? If so, that is pretty funnyAnytime you can add a 30 year old receiver that can put up 300-400 yards a season, you just have to do it. Should we order the rings?