SlinkyRedfoot
Well-Known Member
True- I was more implying they'd still give out the contract out today
Maybe so, maybe not.
True- I was more implying they'd still give out the contract out today
78 wins is a pretty generous forecast for the White Sox.For comparison, here's Fangraphs' projected standings:
Depth Charts » Projected Standings | FanGraphs Baseball
Never heard royals mention in same sentence as heart,grit hustle,and IQ. Maybe that's why they are predicted to suck every yearPECOTA doesnt measure heart, grit, hustle and IQ
thats why the Royals are always predicted to suck
lolNever heard royals mention in same sentence as heart,grit hustle,and IQ. Maybe that's why they are predicted to suck every year
I'd take Perez over Lucroy without concerning myself with any offensive numbers. Right now and for several years running my opinion has been the same. Unless Perez can't squat or throw, it'll be the same next year too.I'm not a big fan of WAR, but I'm not sure how else to weigh this. Perez ranked 5th of 8 qualified catchers last year.
Even without WAR, his OPS was 125 points behind Lucroy and Ramos. About 70 points behind Posey and Molina. I'm not sure his defense makes up that large of an offensive disparity.
Also, he's never been anywhere close to being a free agent, so comparing his contract to catchers who either reached free agency or damn close isn't an apples to apples comparison. Perez, with both of his contracts, opted for security rather than top dollar and there's a cost for that.
His contract's AAV ranks 10th all time for catchers.
Occum's razor.Never heard royals mention in same sentence as heart,grit hustle,and IQ. Maybe that's why they are predicted to suck every year
Thats cuz those are last years standings. Lol78 wins is a pretty generous forecast for the White Sox.
How embarrassing maybe.Thats cuz those are last years standings. Lol
They pegged ya to dip four. Same as Detroit and KC. Stinktown takes a three game hit. Minny, the offseason darlings of the ALC evidently, take all 15 of those Ws for themselves.
ALW gains 8 wins as a group to our net zero.
ALE takes it in the ass. Down 11. (The Rays are on the upswing.)
That's 3 more interleague losses for better of the Leagues. (If my math holds up. I'm doing this from the john.)
Maybe si, maybe no?How embarrassing maybe.
I'd take Perez over Lucroy without concerning myself with any offensive numbers. Right now and for several years running my opinion has been the same. Unless Perez can't squat or throw, it'll be the same next year too.
Lucroy isn't a good enough hitter to swing a lineup from good to great or bad to good. And he's 30.
Perez should be heading into his big money season right now. But he isn't. (Maybe someone held a gun to his head in some other season, no player should be signing a new deal at 25 to cancel out their old deal. When was that previous deal set to end?)And most likely never will.
Can't see justifying him as a first baseman in the future. He'll be done (as any type of commodity)before he hits the market, for the first time.
Evan Longoria did something similar didn't he?There were three other guys I mentioned in addition to Lucroy. I don't think you're crazy for preferring Perez over Lucroy, but I also don't think Perez is unequivocally the best catcher in the bigs.
Measured by OPS, Lucroy was the 33rd best hitter in MLB last year. MLB average slash line from C in 2016 was .243/.311/.393/.704. Lucroy's was .276/.345/.539/.885. That bat, particularly plugged in at C, is a difference maker.
He signed his first MLB contract for $7MM (w/ escalators) as a 21-year-old Mexican with 39 games under his belt. He assumed as little risk as a major league player can, which is why he's not making top dollar. Evaluating his contract(s) now without considering that doesn't make sense.
Had he not signed his contracts, he'd be an unrestricted FA after this coming season. Had he gone for full risk and top dollar (like Bryce Harper), he'd likely be looking at a much larger contract. On the other hand, he could have blown out his knee and made a fraction of what he's actually made.
Perez and Harper are about the most extreme examples of the security/top dollar approach to player contracts that I can think of. I'm not saying that one is better than the other, just that you have to consider how risk averse Perez' strategy was before you bemoan his contract value.
Evan Longoria did something similar didn't he?
Wilson Ramos isn't worth me mentioning being not in Perez class.
I forget who the third guy was.
I'd take Perez over Lucroy without concerning myself with any offensive numbers. Right now and for several years running my opinion has been the same. Unless Perez can't squat or throw, it'll be the same next year too.
Lucroy isn't a good enough hitter to swing a lineup from good to great or bad to good. And he's 30.
Perez should be heading into his big money season right now. But he isn't. (Maybe someone held a gun to his head in some other season, no player should be signing a new deal at 25 to cancel out their old deal. When was that previous deal set to end?)And most likely never will.
Can't see justifying him as a first baseman in the future. He'll be done (as any type of commodity)before he hits the market, for the first time.
Lucroy is no difference maker. He made the playoffs on a team with Brain still juicin and Prince still able to turn his neck. And went 1-12 in the playoffs on a team that was just as good without him last year. Your Indians are lucky he didn't want to be on a much better team.
But that's the thing... few catchers are, and those few rank among the greatest at the position.