scotsman1948
Well-Known Member
He was made a free agent again, he doesn't show up on anyone's roster
according to the Giants there was never any deal
He was made a free agent again, he doesn't show up on anyone's roster
The question that would be asked though if we would move Mitch, would the starter be as good as Tanaka? I don't think Tanaka is an ace, but I do think he's a good #3 type of guy and those guys aren't that easy to find.
I would be thrilled to see Baker back again with the Rangers in 2014.He was made a free agent again, he doesn't show up on anyone's roster
according to the Giants there was never any deal
Exactly.There was a deal, he failed the physical though and the deal was never consumated
Maybe, but put yourself in Darvish's shoes, you would sure be thinking about it. Not saying Darvish would demand an immediate reworking of his contract, and let's hope he is a professional and honors his contract, but it would be disconcerting to anyone, especially when you both come from the same "system" but a few years apart..you're overthinking things
Maybe, but put yourself in Darvish's shoes, you would sure be thinking about it. Not saying Darvish would demand an immediate reworking of his contract, and let's hope he is a professional and honors his contract, but it would be disconcerting to anyone, especially when you both come from the same "system" but a few years apart..
Wonder what caused him to fail the physical. If not serious perhaps we are looking at him. Nice guy to have.He was made a free agent again, he doesn't show up on anyone's roster
There was a deal, he failed the physical though and the deal was never consumated
haha, yeah… I guess I sort of am, but I still think I prefer a DH slightly more than a SP. I think we might need to add something there but I am not sure if a great deal of funds need to be put towards it. I mean right now we have:
1. Yu
2. Holland
3. Harry
4. Perez
5. Ogando
6. Lewis
7. Tepesch
8. Ross (possibly)
9. Blackely ( I think we still have him… could be wrong)
10. Feliz ( doubt he will start but I am sure they are still open to it)
And that not to mention a few guys that have been added to the roster recently that I don't expect to make the team but could be a surprise.
i can't find anything about a deal. do you have a link?
I would be thrilled to see Baker back again with the Rangers in 2014.
The infamous 'high five'He was tearing it up before the injury. That really hurt us when we started facing which seemed like an endless supply of left handers. He was just crushing the ball. After the injury not the same pop.
Well I sure hope so...Yeah you're still overthinking things
Not that its breaking news, but we WILL post the fee for tanaka.
Whenever Mitch Williams talks I want to throw my beer through my tv. He's my least favorite on air personality in any medium ever. He has no earthly idea what he is talking about ever. Just made Tanaka look like the next freakin cy young. Showed a highlight of him throwing a 96 mph fb ONE TIME and said "he's got the stuff." And he said usually pitchers just throw their splitter and hope it does what they want it to do, but he can locate it. Then he tried to prove he could locate it by showing him throwing a splitter in the dirt with 2 strikes as opposed to not bouncing it with less. Freakin someone please just hurt this man
Its not...
because EVERYONE is free to negotiate with Tanaka, the fee isn't paid until a contract agreement is reached
There's no longer the offering of a fee first, it's negotiations, contract, then fee now
Nothing new on Cruz?I heard we're gonna compete for him so I just interpreted it as we're posting a fee. I still don't know fully how it works. But the text said "We'll try for him I think" and because I didn't know how it worked I thought that's what it meant. But I just got another that said "money isn't the issue for us, we just don't think he's worth it when there are other options" so make of that what you will
I heard we're gonna compete for him so I just interpreted it as we're posting a fee. I still don't know fully how it works. But the text said "We'll try for him I think" and because I didn't know how it worked I thought that's what it meant. But I just got another that said "money isn't the issue for us, we just don't think he's worth it when there are other options" so make of that what you will
I heard we're gonna compete for him so I just interpreted it as we're posting a fee. I still don't know fully how it works. But the text said "We'll try for him I think" and because I didn't know how it worked I thought that's what it meant. But I just got another that said "money isn't the issue for us, we just don't think he's worth it when there are other options" so make of that what you will