WastinSomeTime
Well-Known Member
I think its overrated in the sense that its no more important than the guy who pitches the 7th or 8th inning in relief,
Also if someone came in the 8th inning and struck out the side in order, why the hell would you take them out for the 9th, just because it was the "closer's" inning, that's asinine to me
Or the 7th inning guy that comes in with 2 outs and 2 men on after the starter got in trouble? how is his job any less difficult?
THAT'S how the closer position is overrated, he comes on in a none on and nobody out situation and he's hailed for it because he got the almighty "save" if he fails its his OWN doing
the 7th inning and 8th inning guy often have to clean up somebody else's mess and are demonized like a closer if they fail... 2 men & 2 on, and he gives up a single and gives up the tying score, who didn't do their job? the reliever, not the starter who created the mess
I'm not saying thats the way people HERE perceive it but that is the general trend among the ignorant passing fan and even the media
How come the Rolaids relief man award never goes to a truly dominant middle reliever? they exist, ones that are far better than other closers and often times better than their own closer (Kenley Jensen comes to mind)
I could not agree with you more about a guy coming in the 8th and just dominates and you take him out to put in a closer. It also irritates me if the closer is just stinking it up and you leave him in there until you end up losing. The robotic approach to managing nowadays drives me crazy.