deep9er
Well-Known Member
When it comes to filling a need, Baalke’s gut says to draft the best player on the board and not the one who fits an open role on the team. Baalke’s experience with drafts always center on the need versus talent debate. In his mind, talent always wins out.
“The teams that have been successful are drafting for need a year or two ahead of time,” Baalke explained.
So when asked about adding a signal-caller to the roster to join Colin Kaepernick, Colt McCoy and Scott Tolzien, Baalke didn’t balk at the notion of San Francisco adding to the quarterback room.
“We’re not opposed to drafting any position,” he said.
ok good. i agree with Baalke on talent over need.
you have to add as much talent as you can cause thats the purpose of drafting. we wouldn't ignore Need totally, but Need doesn't get you the best talent. in our current situation, i'd lean way over to BPA rounds 1 and 2. not "no questions asked" BPA, but lean way over.
“The teams that have been successful are drafting for need a year or two ahead of time,” Baalke explained.
So when asked about adding a signal-caller to the roster to join Colin Kaepernick, Colt McCoy and Scott Tolzien, Baalke didn’t balk at the notion of San Francisco adding to the quarterback room.
“We’re not opposed to drafting any position,” he said.
ok good. i agree with Baalke on talent over need.
you have to add as much talent as you can cause thats the purpose of drafting. we wouldn't ignore Need totally, but Need doesn't get you the best talent. in our current situation, i'd lean way over to BPA rounds 1 and 2. not "no questions asked" BPA, but lean way over.