Mingo
Well-Known Member
28 man rosters to start the season. No pull hitter shifts on defense (there will have to be 2 infielders on each side of 2nd base).
Based on my thrills and chills of last year - the no shift really works for helping the Sox:
1) TLR didn't use it anyway
2) Sox hitters will hit into fewer double plays - and some of those will become base hits.
On Kimbrel - Kimbrel fell off in the 2nd half of the season last year because he got tired. The media line is to blame it on using Kimbrel for 8th inning setups instead of 9th inning closing. He got arm weariness and lost spin rates and control. If Kimbrel has the same kind of start this year as he did last year - the Sox can use him while he's fresh and trade him while is value is high. On a 28 man roster he is an inning eater for the 1st half of the season.
None- the-less - picking up Kimbrel's option was a mistake. The only question is - do the Sox have a strategy to still harvest some value out of Kimbrel?
Based on my thrills and chills of last year - the no shift really works for helping the Sox:
1) TLR didn't use it anyway
2) Sox hitters will hit into fewer double plays - and some of those will become base hits.
On Kimbrel - Kimbrel fell off in the 2nd half of the season last year because he got tired. The media line is to blame it on using Kimbrel for 8th inning setups instead of 9th inning closing. He got arm weariness and lost spin rates and control. If Kimbrel has the same kind of start this year as he did last year - the Sox can use him while he's fresh and trade him while is value is high. On a 28 man roster he is an inning eater for the 1st half of the season.
None- the-less - picking up Kimbrel's option was a mistake. The only question is - do the Sox have a strategy to still harvest some value out of Kimbrel?