- Thread starter
- #161
MilkSpiller22
Gorilla
I think catchers are inherently that valuable, and when one can hit, too, it's huge. Molina bought his young pitchers a lot of strikes with his pitch framing, controlled the running game to the point that opponents didn't even try to run for the most part, was a wall behind the plate so his pitchers could bury two-strike pitches with confidence, and, on top of all of that, was in contention for the NL batting title. He provided elite offense for a catcher and was the best defensive catcher. Only two catchers were better offensively this season than Molina, Mauer and Santana, and the latter was only just barely better (about the same, really), but Molina was the undisputed best defensive catcher in the Majors (again) at a defensive position which is more important than any other.
He was certainly at least a top five candidate, and even though Carpenter had a better offensive season (and a larger WAR), I don't think any player on the Cardinals meant more to that team than Yadier Molina.
But if he automatically gets a bid because he is a catcher then whats the point of even playing?? I am not bashing him, but in no way did he have a better season than carpenter... Nor votto, mccutchen and goldy... And i dont believe that Yadier was more important to the team this season than carpenter... It sounds like it is all about the intangibles... but how do you measure the intangibles??