tlance
Kyrie Hater
Off the subject a bit. Most people view Jordan as the greatest as he was 6-0 in the finals, over Kareem who was 6-4. The question I have, is why is Brady better with a few losses in the Super bowl when than Montana was 4-0? I am just wondering why the criteria seems to be different with the 2 arguments.
It shouldn't be.
Finals losses as some kind of stain is ridiculous.
Kareem isn't as good as Jordan because he wasn't as good as Jordan. 5 of Kareem's
titles came with Magic. Most of which he wasn't even the best player on his Own team.
But, if the only thing that mattered was team accomplishments, then I will take 6-4 over 6-0 because he got there 4 more times and won just as many.