• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Vikes Fans 2.0

FaCe-LeE-uS

ΔΣΦ
Moderator
58,045
28,625
1,033
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,513.03
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
And if it happens to be us? Hopefully he plays up to it!


:thumb:
We paid 800k for his services last season. He more than paid that off. If you guys offer him over $1mil/per then I hope we offer him $1,000,000.01

Let the contract bidding begin!
 

Win TWINS!!!

Least Racist Member
55,029
14,888
1,033
Joined
Jul 23, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.74
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Percy Harvin as a possibility?
 

ducky

Well-Known Member
7,754
4,256
293
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Not going to lie. A little disappointed that we aren't being a little more aggressive.

Watching Cinci sign a quality guy like Boling for nearly an identical contract than the one we idiotically gave Fusco was a real kick in the nuts.

Hopefully Spielman does a good job of finding a couple of quality value signings before the draft.
 

GNG

What Me Worry?
94,596
16,740
1,033
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Location
Wisconsin
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
It's a move that could work out if Bridgewater can get more accurate on deep balls. :thumb:

At least there's a little activity happening with the team now, after a silent start.
There is still a question mark concerning AP coming back.
 

Win TWINS!!!

Least Racist Member
55,029
14,888
1,033
Joined
Jul 23, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.74
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
There is still a question mark concerning AP coming back.


Of course there is. WTF does that have to do with bringing Wallace in? It's completely irrelevant and immaterial to what you quoted.
 

GNG

What Me Worry?
94,596
16,740
1,033
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Location
Wisconsin
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Of course there is. WTF does that have to do with bringing Wallace in? It's completely irrelevant and immaterial to what you quoted.
Not really irrelevant if the Vikings are transitioning to a passing attack from a ball control running attack spearheaded by AP. This could mean AP may be on the trading block.
 

Win TWINS!!!

Least Racist Member
55,029
14,888
1,033
Joined
Jul 23, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.74
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Not really irrelevant if the Vikings are transitioning to a passing attack from a ball control running attack spearheaded by AP. This could mean AP may be on the trading block.


A move like that doesn't signal anything. It means that Patterson is in the doghouse.
 

GNG

What Me Worry?
94,596
16,740
1,033
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Location
Wisconsin
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
A move like that doesn't signal anything. It means that Patterson is in the doghouse.
Transitioning to a pass heavy attack means less carries for the RB and I'm sure AP wouldn't like that.
 

Win TWINS!!!

Least Racist Member
55,029
14,888
1,033
Joined
Jul 23, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.74
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Transitioning to a pass heavy attack means less carries for the RB and I'm sure AP wouldn't like that.


They needed an upgrade at WR regardless of whether AP was back or not. This has nothing to do with rushing vs passing. It has to do with the lack of progress with Patterson and lack of depth at the position. You're either trolling or clueless. I'm going to venture a guess and say you're both.
 

GNG

What Me Worry?
94,596
16,740
1,033
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Location
Wisconsin
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
They needed an upgrade at WR regardless of whether AP was back or not. This has nothing to do with rushing vs passing. It has to do with the lack of progress with Patterson and lack of depth at the position. You're either trolling or clueless. I'm going to venture a guess and say you're both.
No I'm not trolling and am only trying to have a rational discussion. The Vikes might be better off acquiring a RB that is good at catching passes out of the backfield and try and trade AP for a high pick in the draft. This just makes good sense.
 

bt08

Active Member
843
96
28
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Location
NJ
Hoopla Cash
$ 788.85
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Like the Wallace trade, good stretch the field guy with big play potential. Jennings, Wallace, Patterson, Johnson, Wright, Rudolph, some good pieces for Teddy to work with and continue to develop.
 

JohnRandle

Gold Member
21,342
324
83
Joined
Apr 8, 2011
Location
MN
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,356.27
Fav. Team #1
Transitioning to a pass heavy attack means less carries for the RB and I'm sure AP wouldn't like that.

Wallace is the guy they wanted back in 2012, but he went to Miami, so the Vikes went after Jennings.
They now got who they wanted all along. It makes it easier for AP to get into the backfield with teams having to worry about a deep pass. Jennings was more of a slot receiver, and Patterson isn't quite developing as fast as they would like.
 
Top